Reality, Responsibility, and Reflection: A Philosophical and Ethical Investigation of VR Game Design and Players’ Morality

Authors

  • Intikhab Ahmad Department of Communication of Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui, Hefei. P.R. China
  • Rongting Zhou Department of Communication of Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui, Hefei. P.R. China

Keywords:

Reality, Responsibility, Reflection, Philosophical, Ethical Investigation, VR Game

Abstract

This study explores the ethical and philosophical dimensions of virtual reality (VR) game design, focusing on how immersive VR can influence players' perceptions of morality and empathy. Drawing on philosophical theories like Baudrillard’s hyperreality and Heidegger’s concept of “being-in-the-world,” the study examines VR’s ability to blur boundaries between virtual and real experiences. VR’s capacity to foster immersion, presence, and identity flexibility (Proteus Effect) is shown to impact ethical engagement by making virtual decisions feel consequential. Psychological theories of consequentialism, moral disengagement, and Kohlberg’s stages of moral development further illustrate VR’s potential to shape moral sensitivity and ethical behavior. The application of Value-Sensitive Design (VSD) and Responsible Innovation (RI) offers practical guidance for developing VR games that promote empathy and moral reflection. A case study, "In Your Shoes," demonstrates VR’s capacity to enhance empathy, while emphasizing the need for careful ethical design to mitigate risks.

References

Ahn, S. J., Le, A. M. T., & Bailenson, J. N. (2013). The effect of embodied experiences on self-other merging, attitude, and helping behavior. Media Psychology, 16(1), 7–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2012.755877

Bandura, A. (2016). Moral disengagement: How people do harm and live with themselves. Worth Publishers.

Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. University of Michigan Press.

Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., & Borning, A. (2006). Value-sensitive design and information systems. In Human-computer interaction and management information systems: Foundations (Vol. 1, pp. 348–372).

Gillath, O., McCall, C., Shaver, P. R., & Blascovich, J. (2008). What can virtual reality teach us about prosocial tendencies in real and virtual environments? Media Psychology, 11(2), 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260801906489

Hartmann, T., & Vorderer, P. (2010). It's okay if I'm doing it for myself: Moral disengagement in violent video games. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1696–1704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.002

Hartmann, T. (2018). The moral message in video games: A comparative analysis of moral gameplay mechanics and their impact on players. Journal of Media Ethics, 33(3), 196-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2018.1462636

Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and Time (J. Stambaugh, Trans.). State University of New York Press. (Original work published 1927).

Herrera, F., Bailenson, J., Weisz, E., Ogle, E., & Zaki, J. (2018). Building long-term empathy: A large-scale comparison of traditional and virtual reality perspective-taking. PLoS ONE, 13(10), e0204494. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204494

Klimmt, C., Schmid, H., & Orthmann, J. (2009). Exploring the enjoyment of playing video games. Media Psychology, 9(3), 353–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701299803

Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development, Vol. I: The philosophy of moral development. Harper & Row.

Madary, M., & Metzinger, T. K. (2016). Real virtuality: A code of ethical conduct. Recommendations for good scientific practice and the consumers of VR-technology. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2016.00003

McStay, A. (2018). Emotional AI: The rise of empathic media. Emotion, AI, and the big data society, 8, 170-189.

Ratan, R., & Dawson, M. (2016). When Mii is me: A psychophysiological examination of avatar-self connectedness in Wii Fit. Journal of Media Psychology, 28(3), 150-158. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000188

Roth, C., Vermeulen, I., Vorderer, P., & Klimmt, C. (2018). The experience of agency in virtual worlds: Action, perception, and intention. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.004

Sarkar, S. (2021). Ethical implications of virtual reality and artificial intelligence: Challenges and strategies. Ethics in Information Technology, 23(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09534-y

Sicart, M. (2009). The ethics of computer games. MIT Press.

Slater, M., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2016). Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3, 74. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2016.00074

Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008

Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295

Yee, N., & Bailenson, J. (2007). The Proteus Effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research, 33(3), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00299.x

Downloads

Published

31.10.2024

How to Cite

Intikhab Ahmad, & Rongting Zhou. (2024). Reality, Responsibility, and Reflection: A Philosophical and Ethical Investigation of VR Game Design and Players’ Morality. PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF LAW, ANALYSIS AND WISDOM, 3(10), 1–12. Retrieved from https://pjlaw.com.pk/index.php/Journal/article/view/v3i10-01-12

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 10 (2024): Pakistan Journal of Law, Analysis and Wisdom

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Intikhab Ahmad, Rongting Zhou

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.