Effects of Cybercrimes on the Criminal Justice System of Pakistan

Authors

  • Tayyab Shaheen M.Phil Criminology, Minhaj University Lahore
  • Mian Muhammad Tariq Javed Assistant Professor, College of Law, The University of Lahore
  • Dr. Muhammad Faisal Khan Assistant Professor, School of Criminology, Minhaj University Lahore

Keywords:

Cybercrimes, Criminal Justice System, Effects, Pakistan

Abstract

The objective of this study is to identify the effects of the cybercrimes on the existing criminal justice system of Pakistan. Cybercrimes have unique features and need a complete of investigation, trial and prosecution separately and different from the conventional one. The unseen burdens of the new crimes on criminal justice system slow down the performance of the system over all but also brought some latest technological advancement in the over parts of the criminal justice system. The study is qualitative in nature and based on the interviews of lawyers, judges, prosecutors, investigators and other related persons. The thematic analysis was used to carry out the results in this research. The study shows the tendency of cases is due to inefficiency of the stakeholders involved in the investigation, trial and prosecution.

References

Adams, P. C. (1997). Cyberspace and virtual places. Geographical Review, 87(2), 155-171.

Agarwal, A., Gupta, M., Gupta, S., & Gupta, S. C. (2011). Systematic digital forensic investigation model. International Journal of Computer Science and Security (IJCSS), 5(1), 118-131.

Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47-88.

Agnew, R., Brezina, T., Wright, J. P., & Cullen, F. T. (2002). Strain, personality traits, and delinquency: Extending general strain theory. Criminology, 40(1), 43-72.

Anjum, U. (2020). Cybercrime in Pakistan; detection and punishment mechanism. Časopis o društvenom i tehnološkom razvoju, 2(2).

Baig, Z. A., Szewczyk, P., Valli, C., Rabadia, P., Hannay, P., Chernyshev, M., ... & Peacock, M. (2017). Future challenges for smart cities: Cyber-security and digital forensics. Digital Investigation, 22, 3-13.

Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining'early career'in research. Higher Education, 45(3), 257-279.

Bennett, W. W., & Hess, K. M. (2007). Criminal investigation. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

Bernat, F. P., & Godlove, N. (2012). Understanding 21st century cybercrime for the ‘common’victim: Criminal Justice Matters, 89(1), 4-5.

Chess, D. M., & White, S. R. (2000, September). An undetectable computer virus. In Proceedings of virus bulletin conference (Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 409-422).

Choo, K. K. R. (2011). The cyber threat landscape: Challenges and future research directions. Computers & security, 30(8), 719-731.

Christou, G. (2018). The challenges of cybercrime governance in the European Union. European Politics and Society, 19(3), 355-375.

Loader, B. D., & Thomas, D. (Eds.). (2013). Cybercrime: Law enforcement, security and surveillance in the information age. Routledge.

Madarie, R. (2017). Hackers' Motivations: Testing Schwartz's Theory of Motivational Types of Values in a Sample of Hackers. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 11(1).

Malik, M. S., & Islam, U. (2019). Cybercrime: an emerging threat to the banking sector of Pakistan. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 50-60.

Downloads

Published

31.08.2024

How to Cite

Effects of Cybercrimes on the Criminal Justice System of Pakistan. (2024). PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF LAW, ANALYSIS AND WISDOM, 3(8), 155-163. https://pjlaw.com.pk/index.php/Journal/article/view/v3i8-155-163

Similar Articles

1-10 of 358

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.