An Appraisal of the Doctrine of Command Responsibility: An Example of Evolution or Fragmentation in International Criminal Law?
Keywords:
Command Responsibility, Rome Statute, Causation, Military and non-Military Superiors.Abstract
The command responsibility is now an established doctrine in the international criminal law according to which during an armed conflict the commander is responsible for the acts of troops under his/her control. S/he has the duty to ensure compliance with the legal parameters war of his/her subordinates. This doctrine has been endorsed by the statutes of International Criminal Tribunal of Yugoslavia and International Criminal Court of Rwanda. Many other ad hoc tribunals and domestic courts also have upheld this doctrine. Later on, the Rome Statute of International Criminal Court (ICC) incorporated two new elements in this doctrine: separate standards for knowledge requirements for establishing responsibility of military and civil superiors and causal link between dereliction of the duty of commander and the crime committed by the subordinate. Heuristically, possible outcome of the Rome Statute in this regard has been explained by its hypothetical application on already decided cases of the ad hoc tribunals. The present article endeavours to address whether the adaptation of this doctrine by different criminal tribunals reflects its refinement or it is a case of fragmentation in international criminal law. The research highlights that establishment of this doctrine is an example of evolution in a specialised field. However, it has been tried to show ambiguities in the doctrine of command responsibility in international criminal law and argues that its nuances need to be elucidated for its clear and uniform application.
References
Ambos, K. (2002). Superior Responsibility. In The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary (p. 809). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ambos, K. (2009). Critical Issues in the Bemba Confirmation Decision. Leiden Journal of International Law, 22(4), 721. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156509990185
Badar, M. E. (2011). Participation in crimes in the jurisprudence of the ICTY and ICTR. In W. A. Schabas & N. Bernaz (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of International Criminal Law (pp. 257–258). London: Routledge .
Bakone , J., & Moloto, J. (2009). Command Responsibility in International Criminal Tribunals. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 3, 15.
Cassese, A. (2009). The Oxford companion to international criminal justice (pp. 87–89). Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press.
Darcy, S. (2015). The Limited Reach of Superior Responsibility. In S. Linton, G. Simpson , & W. A. Schabas (Eds.), For the sake of present and future generations: Essays in honour of Roger Clark (p. 374). LEIDEN: Brill.
DoriaJ., Hans-Peter Gasser, & M Cherif Bassiouni. (2009). The legal regime of the International Criminal Court : Essays in honour of Professor Igor Blishchenko : in memoriam Professor Igor Pavlovich Blishchenko (1930-2000) (p. 704). Leiden ; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Gideon Boas, & Schabas, W. (2003). International criminal law developments in the case law of the ICTY (p. 244). Leiden ; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Guillaume, J. G. (2000, October). Address to the Plenary Session of the General Assembly of the United Nations . Presented at the Plenary Session of the General Assembly of the United Nations . Retrieved from https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/press-releases/9/2999.pdf%20.
ICC, Decision of Pre-Trial Chamber II, Bemba case (Case No.ICC-01/05-01/08) 15 June 2009.
ICC, Decision of Appeals Chamber, Bemba Case (ICC 01/05-01/08-3636-Red), 8 June 2018
ICTR, Judgement of Trail Chamber, Prosecutor v. Akayesu, (Case No.ICTR 96-4-T) 2 September 1998.
ICTY, Decision of Trail Chamber, Celebici case (Case No. IT-96-21-T) 16 November 1998.
ICTY, Appeal Judgement Blaskic Case, (Case No. IT-95-14-A) 29 July 2004.
ICTY, Judgement of the Trial Chamber, Sefer Halilovic case (Case NoIT-01-48-T) 16 November 2005.
ILC, Reportof the International Law Commission on the Work of its 55th Session? (5 May-6June and 7 July-8 August 2003) UN Doc A/58/10 (2003 ILC Rep.)
ILC, Reportof the International Law Commission on the Work of its 56th Session? (3 May-4June and 5 July-6 August 2004) UN Doc A/59/10 (2004 ILC Rep.)
ILC, Report of the International LawCommission on the Work of its 57th Session? (2 May-3 June and 11 July-5 August2005) UN Doc A/60/10 (2005 ILC Rep.)
ILC, Reportof the International Law Commission on the Work of its 58th Session? (1 May-9June and 3 July-11 August 2006) UN Doc A/61/10 (2006 ILC Rep.).
InternationalLaw Commission (ILC), Report of the International Law Commission on the Work ofits 54th Session? (29 April-7 June and 22 July-16 August 2002) UN Doc A/57/10(2002 ILC Rep.)
Jenks, C. (1953). The Conflict of Law-Making Treaties. British Year Book ofInternational Law, 30, 401-453.
Karsten, N. (2009). Distinguishing Military and Non-Military Superiors: Reflections on the Bemba Case at the ICC. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 7(5), 983–984.
Koskenniemi, M. (2014). What is International Law for? In International Law (p. 47). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lippman, M. (2000). Humanitarian Law: The Uncertain Contours of Command Responsibility. Tulsa Journal of Comparative and International Law, 8(2), 85. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tjcil/vol8/iss2/2
Maogoto, J. N. (2002). Presiding Over the Ex-President: A Look at Superior Responsibility in Light of the Kosovo Indictment. Deakin Law Review, 7(1), 7. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=902805
Martinez, J. S. (2007). Understanding MensRea in Command Responsibility: From Yamashita to Blaskic and Beyond. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 5(3), 638–650. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqm031
Meloni, C. (2007). Command Responsibility: Mode of Liability for the Crimes of Subordinates or Separate Offence of the Superior? Journal of International Criminal Justice, 7(3), 619–620.
Meyer, S. J. (2011). Responsibility for an Omission? Article 28 of the International Criminal Court Statute on Command Responsibility. Miskolc Journal of International Law, 8(2), 27.
Nerlich, V. (2007). Superior Responsibility under Article 28 ICC Statute: For What Exactly is the Superior Held Responsible? Journal of International Criminal Justice, 5(3), 665–682. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqm033
Pechackova, Martina, The Nature of Command Responsibility Under International Criminal Law (June 9, 2011). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1861342 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1861342
Robinson, D. (2012). How command responsibility got so complicated: A culpability contradiction, its obfuscation, and a simple solution. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 13(1), 1.
Shaw, M. N. (2021). International law (9th ed., p. 48). Cambridge, United Kingdom New York, Ny Port Melbourne, Vic Delhi Singapore : Cambridge University Press.
Sliedregt, E. van . (2011). Three Generations of case law and still ambiguity. In A. Sahar & G. Sluiter (Eds.), The Legacy of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (p. 4). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Triffterer, O. (2002). Causality, a Separate Element of the Doctrine of Superior Responsibility as Expressed in Article 28 Rome Statute? Leiden Journal of International Law, 15(1), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0922156502000080
Värk, R. (2012). Superior Responsibility. Estonian National Defence College Proceedings, 15(1), 143. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2695326
Williamson, J. A. (2008). Some considerations on command responsibility and criminal liability. International Review of the Red Cross, 90(870), 303–307.
Zahar, A. (2001). Command Responsibility of Civilian Superiors for Genocide. Leiden Journal of International Law, 14(3), 591–595. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0922156501000292
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Munazza Akram

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.