Enhancing Learning Motivation through Blended Approaches at the University Level

Authors

  • Faran Ahamd PhD Scholar (Education), University of Education, division of Education, Lahore
  • Dr. Bushra Naz Lecturer, Department of Education, GC Women University Faisalabad
  • Shahzadi Aroosh Khan Instructor (Department of Education), Virtual University of Pakistan

Keywords:

Blended Learning, Motivation Towards Learning, Collaboration, Social Media

Abstract

The importance of social media for interaction and socializing cannot be denied. Over time, social media has started playing its part in an educational circle and augmenting teachers’ efforts to keep students motivated and toward better learning. The current study aims to assess the impact of blended learning approaches on university students' motivation towards learning. It was a quantitative and descriptive study. The study sample comprised 350 participants from public sector universities in Lahore through a simple random sampling technique. Self-developed 5-point Likert scale was used to get the data. The data were analyzed through SPSS 22, including descriptive and inferential statistics with mean, SD, ANOVA, and regression. Based on the findings, the research identified ten factors influencing students' motivation: face-to-face and collaborative learning, social presence, group discussion, cognitive presence, and the teachers' role in creating and sustaining motivation. The paper also discusses the increasing importance of social media, such as WhatsApp, in educational settings and the potential of blended learning to enhance students' motivation. The findings suggest that teachers' role in creating intrinsic and sustaining motivation is the most influencing factor among the ten identified factors. The study provides valuable insights into the potential of blended learning to enhance students' motivation and the increasing role of social media in educational settings.

References

Ali, Z., Ahmad, N., Rehman, H. U., Ullah, N., & Zahra, T. (2023). Investigating Teacher Educators’ Perceptions on Technology Integration in Teacher Preparation Programs. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 3(2), 341-355.

Chen, P.-S. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1222-1232.

Dawley, L. (2007). The tools for successful online teaching. IGI Global.

Friesen, N. (2012). Report: Defining blended learning, viewed 10 October 2019. In.

Holec, H. (1979). Autonomy and foreign language learning. ERIC.

Johnson, M., & Majewska, D. (2022). Formal, non-formal, and informal learning: What are they, and how can we research them? Journal of Education, Society & Multiculturalism, 1(2).

Larsen, L. J. E. (2012). Teacher and student perspectives on a blended learning intensive English program writing course. Iowa State University.

Li, R. (2022). Effects of blended language learning on EFL learners' language performance: An activity theory approach. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(5), 1273-1285.

Jamil, M., Muhammad, Y. Masood, S. & Habib, Z. (2020). Critical Thinking: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Education Policy and Secondary School Science Curriculum Documents. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education: 14(2), 249-258.

Naseer, H., Muhammad, Y., & Jamil, M. (2022). Critical Thinking Skills in Pakistan Studies textbook: Qualitative Content Analysis. Pakistan Journal of Social Research, 4(3), 744-755.

Niederhauser, D. S., Howard, S. K., Voogt, J., Agyei, D. D., Laferriere, T., Tondeur, J., & Cox, M. J. (2018). Sustainability and scalability in educational technology initiatives: Research-informed practice. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23, 507-523.

Rattanawong, A., Warawudhi, R., & Ramrit, Y. (2019). Because Schools Are Anywhere And Anytime: Students' Attitudes towards Asynchronous Online Learning. Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University (Humanities, Social Sciences and arts), 12(4), 915-935.

Reich, J., & Ito, M. (2017). From good intentions to real outcomes: Equity by design in learning technologies. Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.

Sharjeel, M., Muhammad, Y., & Waqar, Y. (2022). Primary students' online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: Perspective of mothers. Global Regional Review, 7(2), 200‒210.

Stewart, A., Inglis, G., Jardine, L., Koorts, P., & Davies, M. W. (2012). A randomised controlled trial of blended learning to improve the newborn examination skills of medical students. Archives of Disease in Childhood-Fetal and Neonatal Edition.

Tanveer, M. (2011). Integrating e-learning in classroom-based language teaching: Perceptions, challenges and strategies. Conference Proceedings, 4th International Conference ICT for Language Learning, Florence, Italy,

Thomas, M., Khan, A. H., & Ahmad, N. (2022). Way forward for post pandemic online teaching: A case of higher education in Pakistan. Journal of Humanities, Social and Management Sciences (JHSMS), 3(1), 1-15.

Tomlinson, B., & Whittaker, C. (2013). Blended learning in English language teaching. London: British Council, 252.

Wang, J. (2021). Technology integration in education: policy plans, teacher practices, and student outcomes Leiden University.

Downloads

Published

31.12.2023

How to Cite

Enhancing Learning Motivation through Blended Approaches at the University Level. (2023). PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF LAW, ANALYSIS AND WISDOM, 2(03), 146-156. https://pjlaw.com.pk/index.php/Journal/article/view/v2i03146156

Similar Articles

1-10 of 260

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.