Balancing Act of Combating Judicial Corruption While Respecting the Independence ofJudiciary: A Case Study District Faisalabad Punjab
Keywords:
Judicial Corruption, Judicial Independence, Accountability Mechanisms, Rule of Law, District Judiciary, Faisalabad, PakistanAbstract
Judicial corruption undermines the rule of law, erodes public trust, and hampers access to justice. However, efforts to combat judicial corruption must be carefully balanced to preserve judicial independence, a cornerstone of democratic governance. This study explores the intricate interplay between judicial accountability and independence within the district judiciary of Faisalabad, Punjab. Using a qualitative case study approach, the research examines instances of corruption, the effectiveness of existing accountability mechanisms, and the challenges in maintaining an impartial judiciary. Data is gathered through interviews with legal practitioners, judicial officers, and litigants, alongside an analysis of judicial oversight frameworks in Pakistan. The study highlights the structural and procedural deficiencies in combating judicial misconduct while ensuring non-interference in judicial decision-making. It further assesses the role of the Lahore High Court, bar associations, and anti-corruption bodies in addressing the issue. The findings underscore the need for a reformed accountability framework that strengthens internal disciplinary mechanisms without compromising judicial autonomy. The study concludes by proposing policy recommendations to enhance transparency, enforce ethical conduct, and strike a balance between judicial accountability and independence.
References
Admin, & Admin. (2015, October 6). Supreme Court of Pakistan. https://www.supremecourt.gov.pk/
Afrobarometer (2010/11), www.afrobarometer.org. Online data analysis: institutions and leaders → courts and security → corruption: judges and magistrates. Available at: www.afrobarometer-online-analysis.com/aj/AJBrowser AB.jsp.
Bangalore Principles (2006), Strengthening basic principles of judicial conduct (as endorsed through ECOSOC Resolution 2006/23). Available at: www. unodc.org/pdf/corruption/corruption_judicial_res_e.pdfwww.unodc.org/pdf/ corruption/corruption_judicial_res_e.pdf.
Burbank, Stephen B., and Barry Friedman, "Reconsidering Judicial Independence" in Burbank, Stephen B., and Barry Friedman (eds.). 2002. Judicial Independence at the Crossroads. An Interdisciplinary Approach, California: Sage Publications.
Capelleti Mauro. 1985. “Who Watches the Watchmen? A Comparative Study on Judicial Responsibility”, in Shetreet, Shimon, and Jules Deschenes (eds.). Judicial Independence: The Contemporary Debate, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
Chavez, Rebecca Bill. 2004. The Rule of Law in Nascent Democracies: Judicial Politics in Argentina, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Clark, Davis S. 1975. “Judicial Protection of the Constitution in Latin America”, Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, vol. 2.
DA (Democratic Alliance) (2007), The DAs judicial review: judicial independence. Available at: www.da.org.za/docs/621/judicialpercent20 review_ document.pdf.
Encyclopedia Britannica Online (2003), http://www.search.eb.com/eb/article?eu=23102.
Eurobarometer (2012), Corruption (Special Eurobarometer 374). Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_374_en.pdf.
Feld, Lars P., and Stefan Voigt. 2003. “Economic Growth and Judicial Independence: Cross Country Evidence Using a New Set of Indicators”, European Journal of Political Economy, vol. 19, 497-527.
Ferejohn, John. 1999. “Independent Judges, Dependent Judiciary: Explaining Judicial Independence”, Southern California Law Review, vol. 72, 353-384.
GCR (2012), Global Competitiveness Report 2011–12. World Economic Forum, Geneva. Available at: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global CompetitivenessReport_2012-13.pdf.
Gloppen, S. (ed.) (2010), Courts and Power in Latin America and Africa. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Gloppen, S. and E. Kasimbazi (2008), Elections in court: the judiciary and Uganda’s 2006 Election Process. In J. Kiiza, S. Mahara and L. Rakner (eds), Electoral Democracy in Uganda. Kampala: Fountain Publishers, pp. 53–89.
Gloppen, S., R. Gargarella and E. Skaar (eds) (2004), Democratization and the Judciary: The Accountability Function of Courts in New Democracies. London: Frank Cass.
Golub, S. (2007), The ‘other 90 per cent’: how NGOs combat corruption in non-judicial justice systems. In TI (Transparency International), Global Corruption Report 2007. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 129–137.
Guarnieri, Carlo. 2003. “Courts as an Instrument of Horizontal Accountability. The case of Latin Europe”, in Jose Maria Maravall and Adam Przeworski (eds.), Democracy and the Rule of Law, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hayek, Friedrich (1960), The Constitution of Liberty , Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Helmke, Gretchen. 2002. “The Logic of Strategic Defection: Court-Executive Relations in Argentina Under Democracy and Dictatorship”, American Political Science Review, vol. 96, no.2, June.
ICJ (International Commission of Jurists) (10 February 2012), The International Commission of Jurists condemns the conviction of Judge Baltasar Garzón to an 11-year ban from the office. Available at: www.icj.org/the-internationalcommission-of-jurists-condemns-the-conviction-of-judge-baltasar-garzon-toan-11-year-ban-from-the-office/.
ICJ (International Commission of Jurists) (4 December 2012), Russia: disciplinary measures must not hamper the independence of judges. Available at: www.icj.org/russia-disciplinary-measures-must-not-hamper-the-independenceof-judges/.
ICJ (International Commission of Jurists) (6 August 2012), Executive control over judiciary persists in Tunisia. Available at: www.icj.org/executive-controlover-judiciary-persists-in-tunisia/.
JIG (The Judicial Integrity Group) (2010), Measures for the effective implementation of the Bangalore principles of judicial conduct. JIG Meeting Lusaka, Zambia, January 2010. Available at: judicialintegritygroup.org/resources/ documents/BP_Implementationpercent20Measures_Engl.pdf.
JIG (The Judicial Integrity Group) (2012), The Record of the Seventh Meeting of the Judicial Group on Strengthening Judicial Integrity. JIG meeting Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany, October 2012. Available at: http://www. judicialintegritygroup.org/resources/documents/JIG%202012%20MUNICH% 20MEETING%20REPORT%202.pdf.
La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Christian Pop-Elches, and Andrei Shleifer. 2003. “Judicial Checks and Balances”, manuscript.
Larkins, Christopher. 1996. “Judicial Independence and Democratization: A Theoretical and Conceptual Analysis”, American Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 44.
Latinobarometer (2010), at www.latinobarometro.org. Online data analysis: confidence in judiciary. Available at: www.latinobarometro.org/latino/LAT AnalizeQuestion.jsp.
Locke, John ([1690], 1976), The Second Treatise of Government, ed. J. W. Gough. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Madison, John, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay ([1788], 1961), The Federalist Papers, New York, NY: New American Library.
Matei, A. and L. Matei (2011), Assessing the anti-corruption strategies. theoretical and empirical models. Journal of Management and Strategy, 2 (1), 23–40. 78 Corruption, grabbing and development Columns Design XML Ltd / Job: Soreide-Corruption_grabbing_and_development / Division: 07SoreideChapter5 /Pg. Position: 11 / Date: 13/1
Przeworski, Adam. 2004. “The Last Instance: Are Institutions the Primary Cause of Economic Development?”, European Journal of Sociology, vol. XLV, no. 2, pp. 165- 188.
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1999. Corruption and Government. Causes, Consequences, and Reform, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Russell, Peter H. 2001. “Toward a General Theory of Judicial Independence”, in Peter H. Russell and David M. O’Brien, Judicial Independence in the Age of Democracy. Critical Perspectives from Around the World, Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
Schelifer, Andrei, and Robert W. Vishny. 1993. “Corruption”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, August.
Svensson, Jakob. 2005. “Eight Questions about Corruption”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 19-42.
Treisman, Daniel. 2000. “The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-National Study”, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 76, pp. 399-457.
Webportal@uwc.ac.za. (n.d.). Webinar - the balancing act of combating judicial corruption while respecting the independence of the judiciary in Sub-Saharan africa. UWC. https://www.uwc.ac.za/news-and-announcements/events/webinar-the-balancing-act-of-combating-judicial-corruption-while-respecting-the-independence-of-the-judiciary-in-sub-saharan-africa
Widner, Jennifer. 2001. Building the Rule of Law, New York: W.W. Norton.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Saqib Aziz Sani, Imran Salem, Naeem Khan, Bilal Ahmed, Shamraiz Ahmed
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
LEGALOPEDIA EDUCATINIA (PVT) LTD