The Notion of ‘Daman’ in Islamic Law and Its Application in Pakistani Criminal Law: An Analytical Study
Keywords:
Daman; Value of Daman; Islamic Criminal Law; Pakistan Penal CodeAbstract
Pakistan inherited its legal system from the colonial British India, however, Islamization of laws brought a great body of rules of the Pakistani legal system in compliance with the principles of Islamic law. Similarly, the Chapter related to offences against the human body in Pakistan Penal Code is claimed to be based on the principles of Islamic law. The Islamic law of torts (Daman), which has roots in classical Islamic law, has been widely applied in numerous provisions in the said Chapter and a bulk of case law has evolved consequently upon them. In Pakistan Penal Code, diyat, arsh and daman all are treated as punishments while the position in classical Islamic law is presumed to be different. The approach taken in section 53 of the Pakistan Penal Code regarding Daman is that it has been considered a form of punishment and later on in Section 299 (d) of PPC, Daman is defined as the compensation determined by the Court to be paid by the offender to the victim. This creates doubts in the minds of the jurists that whether or not this approach is valid, requiring analysis in light of the principles of Islamic law as enunciated in the literature of classical Muslim jurists. This paper expounds the notion of ‘Daman’ in Islamic law and its application in Pakistani law. The research is based on qualitative research methods. The analysis in this article finds that though the notion of Daman is treated as a punishment in the Pakistani Penal Code which appears to be contrary is contrary to the classical Muslim jurists. However, rules regarding Daman and the jurisprudence developed by the higher courts in the country have clarified the actual position of Daman that is found in consonance with the principles of Islamic law and jurisprudence.
References
Abdul Qadir. (1977). ‘Awdah, Al-Fiqh al-Jinā’ī al-Islāmī Muqāranan bi l-Tashrī‘ al-Wad‘i (Vol. 1). Cairo: Maktabah Dār al-Turath.
Abid Hussain v Chairman Bait ul Mal, PLD, 482, LHC (2002).
Abu Abdullah Muhammad bin Yazid Ibn Majah, Sunan, Al-Muhaqqiq, (2009): Shoaib al-Arnawut, Dar al-Risalah al-Ilmiyyah
Abu al-Barakat Ahmad Ibn Muhammad Ibn Ahma Dardir, (2013). “Al-sharh al-kabi”, vol 3, Turathfor Solutions.
Abu al-Hassan Ali ibn Umar al-Dar Qutni, (2004). Sunan, Muwassasah al-Risalah
Abu Dawud al-Sajistani, (n.d.) Sunan, Al-Muhaqqiq; Muhammad Muhyuddin Abdul Hameed Beirut: Al Maktabah al-Asriyhah
Abu Ḥamid Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad al-Ṭusi al-Ghazali, Al-Mustasfa,min 'ilm al-usul, (1993). In Arabic, “On the Legal Theory of Islamic Jurisprudence” vol 1, (Dar al-Kutub al-Elmiyyah) 281;
ALAM, Q. (2019). The Qisas and Diyat Law in Pakistan: Prosecution of Offence of Murder. Islamic Studies, 58(4), 551–562. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26899443
Asghar Ali v The State, YLR, 1156, LHC (2003)
Government of the Punjab v Abid Hussain, PLD, 315, SC (2007)
Khan, G. G. (2018). An appraisal of methodology for Islamization of laws in Pakistan. Islamabad Law Review, 2(1 & 2), 1-20.
Majid Saleh Al-qadan, (2003). “Ahkam al-daman fi al-jinayat fi al-shariat al-islamia” (in Arabic) [Rules of Daman in Criminal Law in Islamic Jurisprudence]. MS thesis, Al-Madina International University. <https://elibrary.mediu.edu.my/books/MAL05634.pdf> accessed on 28 February 2023.
Malik bin Anas, Al-Muwatta, Al-Muhaqqiq; Muhammad Mustafa Al-Azami, (2004) (Abu Dhabi: Muassasah Zayed bin Sultan al Nahyan).
Muhammad bin Ismail Al-Bukhari, Al-Jami' Al-Musnad Al-Sahih Al-Mukhtasar, Al-Muhaqqiq; Muhammad Zuhair bin Nasir al-Nasir, (1422 A.H.) Sahih al Bokhari, Daar Tauq al-Najat
Muhammad ibn Mukarram ibn Ali ibn Ahmad ibn Manzur al-Ansari al-Ifriqi al-Misri al-Khazraji, Lisan al-arab (2000). In Arabic, “The Arabic Language Dictionary” vol 13 (3rdedn, Dar Sader) 257.
Muhammad Taj v the State and another, YLR, 261, PHC (2011)
Qamar ul Zaman v the State, MLD, 896, LHC [2022] LHC 2 MLD 896.
Rahim, A. (1911). The Principles of Muhammadan Jurisprudence, University of California Libraries.
Sabiq, S. (n.d.). Fiqh al-Sunnah, Vol. 2. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub.
Siti Zubaidah Ismail, (2012). The Modern Interpretation of the Diyat Formula for the Quantum of Damages: The Case of Homicide and Personal Injuries. Arab Law Quarterly 26 (3) 361.
Tabassum, S., Munir, B. and A. K. Mahmood, (2020). Imprisonment for Non-Payment of Diyat: A Critical Analysis of Two Leading Cases. V (III) Global Legal Studies Review, V(III), 55-61.
Wahabah bin Mustafa Al-Zuhaili, (1982). Nazariat al-Daman (in Arabic) [Theory of Islamic Law of Torts], Beirut: Dar al Fikr Publishers.
Zahid Rehman v the State PLD, 77, SC (2015)
Zayn al-Abidin Ibrahim IbnNujaym, Al-ashbahwa al-nazair, (1985) (in Arabic) [Similar and Analogous Cases], Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyahh.
Zuhaili, (2006) Al-Qawaid al-FiqhiyyahwaTatbiqatuha fi al-Mazahib al-Arba’a(in Arabic)[Legal Maxims and their Applications in Four Schools]vol 1, Beirut: Dar al-Fikr
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Akbar Khan, Syed Asif Ali Shah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.