Impact of Content Supplementary Concept Maps of Science on Self-Efficacy
Keywords:
Concept Maps, Content Supplementary Materials, General Science, Self-Efficacy, 7th grade students.Abstract
Understanding and improving students’ confidence in their ability to learn science is essential for enhancing their academic performance. Literature supports that concept maping improves learning in a variety of areas, including chemistry, physics, and general science, which eventually raises students' academic achievement. Students can better organize difficult concepts, see how scientific concepts relate to one another, and create meaningful connections that deepen their conceptual understanding, which ultimately may affect their psychological domain. Self-efficacy and academic achievements are strongly related because students who can clearly perceive how concepts relate to one another tend to feel more confident about their capacity to learn, remember, and apply scientific concepts. Students' self-efficacy in their own academic ability rises when they succeed using structured visual aids like concept maps, which boosts their confidence and motivation in science learning. The research aimed to investigate how content supplementary concept maps affect academic self-efficacy in General Science of seventh-grade students. For this study content was delimited to concepts related to chemistry in General Science textbook. The population for this study included 307 seventh-grade female students from two elementary schools in Sargodha City. The sample comprised 143 students from public sector institutions. A quasi-experimental design with pretest and posttest control group was employed for this research. The control group received traditional textbook instructions and concept maps attached at the end of selected content whereas the experimental groups received detailed instruction on concept maps, including their purpose and process, with concept maps attached at the end of the selected content. A self-efficacy scale was utilized for both the pre-test and post-test quantification of self-efficacy. Major findings of the study was Concept maps with understanding of its purpose and process improves student’s self-efficacy along with its component constructs i.e generalized academic self-efficacy and subject specific self-efficacy. On the basis of this study, it is recommended that curriculum designers may use this strategy in content presentation and ultimately into teaching methods in order to successfully accomplish learning goals related to enhance student’s self-efficacy, fostering their motivation and confidence in learning general science.
References
Al-Mekhlafi, A. (2023). Effect of concept mapping on science achievement and self-efficacy among middle school students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(4), 567–580. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359067960_Effect_of_Concept_Mapping_On_Students'_Academic_Achievement
Ali, M., & Zaman, A. (2021). Impact of traditional teaching methods on students’ engagement and learning outcomes in science education. Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 15(2), 45–56. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378003254_Impact_of_Teaching_Methodologies_on_Student_Learning_Enhancement_and_Academic_Achievement_at_the_Secondary_Level
Artino, A. R., Jr. (2012, April 11). Academic self-efficacy: From educational theory to instructional practice. Perspectives on Medical Education, 1(2), 76–85.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-012-0012-5
Alharbi, H. S. M. (2024). The effectiveness of the concept mapping strategy in developing digital concepts among students at Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 14(2), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2024-0042
Andres, H. (2020). The role of active teaching, academic self-efficacy, and learning behaviors in student performance. Journal of International Education in Business, 13(2), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-02-2020-0017
Almulla, M. A., & Alamr, M. M. (2021). Using conceptual mapping for learning to affect students’ motivation and academic achievement. Sustainability, 13(7), 4029. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13074029
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117–148. Retrieved from https://educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au/news/pdfs/Bandura%201993.pdf
Bandura, A. (1997). Insights. Self-efficacy. Harvard Mental Health Letter, 13(9), 4–6. Retrieved from-https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227665752_Self Efficacy_A_Concept_Analysis
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-08589-000
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/10067/chapter/7
Kinchin, I. M. (2019). Concept mapping in science education: Promoting meaningful learning. Springer.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348590219_Concept_Mapping_and_Education
Luszczynska, A., Gutierrez-Dona, B., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). General self-efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries. International Journal of Psychology, 40(2), 80–89.
Lopez-Garrido, G. (2025, May 1). Bandura’s self-efficacy theory of motivation in psychology. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/self-efficacy.html
Munna, A. S., & Kalam, M. A. (2021). Teaching and learning process to enhance teaching effectiveness: A literature review. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI), 4(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.33750/ijhi.v4i1.102
McLeod, S. (2025, March 31). Constructivism learning theory & philosophy of education. Simply Psychology. Retrieved from Simply Psychology website.
Novak, J. D. (1971). Concept learning in science. Theory into Practice, 10(2), 129–133.
Nesbit, J. C., &Adesope, O. O. (2021). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis.Review of Educational Research, 91(3), 415–449. Nesbit, J. C., &Adesope, O. O. (2021). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 91(3), 415–449.
Novak, J. D., &Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge University Press. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=706854
Pajares, F. (2002). Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self-regulated learning. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 116–125.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_8
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2020-16353-001
Yánez, J. (2023). Active learning strategies for enhancing student engagement and understanding. International Journal of Educational Research, 115, 102125. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379404530_Active_Learning_Strategies_for_Engaging_Students_and_Enhancing_Learning
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hamda Nasir, Ahmad Bilal Cheema

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






LEGALOPEDIA EDUCATINIA (PVT) LTD