Biological Weapons Convention: The U.S. and Russia's Compliance Challenges
Keywords:
BWC, Biological Weapons, United States, Russia, Compliance, Verification, International Law, International SecurityAbstract
The Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) of 1972 represents a cornerstone of international efforts to prevent the proliferation of biological weapons. However, ensuring compliance remains a significant challenge, particularly among major powers such as the United States and Russia. This article examines the divergent perspectives of these two nations regarding BWC compliance, analyzing how national security concerns, historical legacies, and strategic priorities influence their approaches. By conducting a comparative analysis, the study reveals unique and shared challenges each country faces, including issues related to dual-use biotechnology, transparency, verification, and political influences. Findings underscore the impact of these challenges on international security and highlight areas for potential improvement in BWC enforcement. The study concludes by proposing recommendations for enhancing compliance through multilateral cooperation and trust-building mechanisms, thus advancing global efforts toward biological disarmament.
References
Alibek, K. (1999). Biohazard: The Chilling True Story of the Largest Covert Biological Weapons Program in the World—Told from Inside by the Man Who Ran It. Random House.
Allison, R. (2013). Russia, the West, and Military Intervention. Oxford University Press.
Barletta, M. (2002). After the Cold War: Russia’s Changing Role in Non-Proliferation. Arms Control Today, 32(1), 12-17.
Drell, S. D., & Sofaer, A. D. (1999). The New Terror: Facing the Threat of Biological and Chemical Weapons. Hoover Institution Press.
Gould, C. (2011). Bioterrorism and Biological Warfare. Springer.
Hoffman, D. (2015). The Dead Hand: The Untold Story of the Cold War Arms Race and Its Dangerous Legacy. Anchor.
Kelle, A. (2007). The Role of Biotechnology in Countering Terrorism. Springer.
Koblentz, G. D. (2014). Living Weapons: Biological Warfare and International Security. Cornell University Press.
Koblentz, G. D., & Tucker, J. B. (2016). Dual-Use Research and the Global Biodefense Policy. Oxford University Press.
Meselson, M. (2000). Averting the Hostile Use of Biotechnology. Government Printing Office.
Miller, J. (2006). Biological Weapons Disarmament. Stanford University Press.
Miller, S. (2018). Biological Weapons and the Limits of Control. Stanford University Press.
Moodie, M. (2001). Bioterrorism: The Threat and the Response. National Defense University.
Rauf, T. (2005). Compliance and Disarmament in International Treaties. Oxford University Press.
Roffey, R. (2014). Biological Weapons Compliance and Verification. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sloan, S. R. (2002). Bioterrorism, Biosecurity, and Biodefense. Sage Publications.
Tucker, J. B. (2012). Innovation, Dual Use, and Security: Managing the Risks of Emerging Biological and Chemical Technologies. MIT Press.
United Nations. (1972). Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. Geneva: United Nations.
Whitby, S., & Dando, M. (2015). Preventing Biological Threats: What You Can Do. Springer.
Zanders, J. P., & Turlington, J. (2019). The Biological Weapons Convention and Verification Challenges. Harvard University Press.
Zilinskas, R. A., & Mauger, C. (2015). The Soviet Biological Weapons Program and Its Legacy in Today’s Russia. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science, 13(4), 1-9.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sultan Salah-ud-Din, Dr. Tauqeer Hussain Sargana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
LEGALOPEDIA EDUCATINIA (PVT) LTD