The Doctrine of Force Majeure under the Law of Contract in Pakistan: A Critical Exposition

Authors

  • Amr Ibn Munir LLB Student, Department of Law, International Islamic University, Islamabad

Keywords:

Contract, Agreement, Frustration, Force Majeure, Act of God

Abstract

This paper discusses what is the meaning of force majeure; what is its extent and scope; what is its effect; the onus to prove force majeure is on who; can a contract hit by force majeure become void; is it incorporated within our law; what can be included in force majeure and what cannot be included in it; The methodology used in this paper is doctrinal. The main findings of this paper are that force majeure means any superior or irresistible force that causes an event to occur due to an Act of God. Examples can be of tsunamis, floods, earthquakes etc. Hence any natural disaster that strikes is an Act of God. It is incorporated within the doctrine of frustration which in turn is incorporated within Section 56 of the Act and as well Section 32 of the Act. the act becoming physically impossible to perform has two things in mind, one is it becoming physically impossible to perform due to unforeseen circumstances caused by human intervention, such as mobs, strikes, protests and more, while the second thing is the act becoming physically impossible to perform due to unforeseen circumstances caused by an Act of God, such as snowstorms, thunderstorms and it also includes natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods, tsunamis etc. An act of God that is a natural disaster or is at such an extent that it causes a lot of damage, the same only needs to be proved by providing evidence that the subject-matter was damaged by the act of God and it caused this amount of damage. And of course, anyone who claims that an act of God occurred must also prove the same by providing sufficient and substantial evidence that it had occurred. A force majeure event absolves a party from liability for the non-performance of a contract due to a supervening impossibility, when a dispute arises. contract hit by force majeure becomes null and void. Although, stipulations could be added in such a case where the parties would stipulate that the contract would be put on hold till the resolution of the force majeure event. Some parties could also stipulate that certain obligations can be suspended where force majeure occurs.

References

Abdul Waheed v. Additional District Judge, PLD 2021 Lahore 453.

Anjuman-i-Mutasareen Khshatkaran River Ravi v. Province of Punjab, 2012 CLC 1145 [Lahore].

Atlas Cables (Pvt.) Limited v. Islamabad Electric Supply Company Limited, 2016 CLC 1677 [Islamabad], 2016 CLD 1833 [Islamabad].

Bryan A. Garner and Henry Campbell Black, “Black’s Law Dictionary”, (St. Paul, MN, Thomson/West, 8th ed., 2004).

Conticottons S.A. Co. v. Farooq Corporation, 1999 CLC 1018 [Karachi].

Government of N.W.F.P v. Daud Shah, Contractor, Peshawar, 1996 SCMR 1713.

Henry Campbell Black, Black’s Law Dictionary, (St. Paul, Minn. West Publishing Co., 2nd ed. 1910).

Ibn Munir, Amr, The Doctrine of Frustration under the Law of Contract in Pakistan: A Critical Evaluation”, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4549332 , August 30th, 2023.

International General Insurance Company of Pakistan Limited v. British India Steam Navigation Co. Ltd., 1987 CLC 152 [Karachi].

Jamil Akhtar v. Secretary, Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Islamabad, 1999 PLC (C.S.) 719 [Federal Service Tribunal].

Rana, A. A. (2020). Essentials of a valid contract: A comparative study of Sighah in Islamic law and the agreement in the Contract Act, 1872. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3722822

K-Electric v. Federation of Pakistan, PLD 2014 Sindh 504.

Lebeaupin v. Richard Crispin & Co., [1920] 2 K.B. 714.

Liaquat Hayat Khan Wahla v. Mian Muhammad Trust Hospital, Faisalabad, 2008 MLD 883 [Lahore].

Messrs Indus Plastic Industry, Rawalpindi v. Collector of Customs and Central Excise, Rawalpindi, 2003 PTD 2105 [Lahore High Court].

Messrs Jehangir Services (Private)Limited v. Mst. Bibi Rukhsana Begum, PLD 1995 Karachi 329.

Messrs Rehman Weaving Factory (Regd.), Bahawalnagar v. Industrial Development Bank of Pakistan, PLD 1981 SC 21.

Messrs Venus Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd v. Additional Collector Customs Preventive, MCC Customs House, 2014 PTD (Trib.) 108 [Customs Appellate Tribunal, Karachi].

Miss Rifat Hamid Ghani v. Muhammad Shamsul Jalil, 1987 CLC 1902 [Karachi].

Muhammad Hussain v. Province of Sindh, 2014 MLD 174 [Sindh].

Provincial Government v. Ahalian Naltar Bala, Pain, 2022 YLR 635 [Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court].

See, Ch. Tawangar Hussain v. Director, Manpower and Training, Punjab, 1983 PLC (C. S.) 1011 [Service Tribunal Punjab].

Tabish Gauhar v. The State, 2016 PCr.LJ 1398 [Sindh].

Thames Valley Power Ltd. v. Total Gas and Power Ltd. [2006] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 441.

The State v. Muhammad Azam, 2012-14 GBLR 10 [Supreme Appellate Court].

West’s Encyclopedia of American Law, (Thomson Gale, 2nd ed., Vol. 4., 2005).

Energy Watchdog v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, (2017) 14 SCC 80.

Pakistan State Oil Company Ltd v. Pakistan National Shipping Corporation, 2021 CLC 761 [Sindh].

Downloads

Published

30.09.2023

How to Cite

The Doctrine of Force Majeure under the Law of Contract in Pakistan: A Critical Exposition. (2023). PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF LAW, ANALYSIS AND WISDOM, 2(02), 234-241. https://pjlaw.com.pk/index.php/Journal/article/view/64

Similar Articles

1-10 of 136

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.