Victims’ Rights and Criminal Justice Reform: A Critical Assessment of Victim-Centered Approaches
Keywords:
Gender Victim-Centered Justice; Victims’ Rights; Criminal Justice Reform; Restorative Justice; Due Process; Victim Participation; Procedural Justice; International Criminal CourtAbstract
The position of the victims in the criminal justice systems was marginal, and they were mostly limited to the status of the witnesses during the whole twentieth century, when the state-offender relations reigned supreme. However, since the 1970s, an important paradigmatic change has been taking place which has been contributed by the rights-of-the-victims movement, the changing human rights discourses and the increasing awareness of the shortcomings of offender-based models of justice. This paper critically analyses the birth and convergence of victim-centered justice, its historical development, normative context, and the broadening of it in the context of domestic and international criminal justice systems. The paper examines the acceptance of the rights of the victims to protection, participation, information, dignity and reparations in a formal manner, outlining the important legal and procedural milestones, such as the powerful structure of the International Criminal Court. It also addresses the thorny relationship between the increased victim involvement and the structural and doctrinal guarantees of the fundamental due process in the context of the provision of the procedural agency to the victim under the adversarial systems. Restorative justice is explored as an alternative victim-based system that focuses on repairing harm, responsibility, and an inclusive conversation as it works together with the formal criminal justice systems. Using interdisciplinary literature, the article evaluates in a critical manner the assumptions of the theory, structural constraints, and ambiguities of victim-centered justice in an empirical manner. It raises the dangers of homogenizing the needs of victims, re-creating the power imbalances in institutions, and modifying the participation into a purely symbolic recognition instead of substantive impact. The article provides a conclusion that as much as victim-centered justice can be a dramatic normative development, its success requires the context-specific, enforceable, and empirical-founded systems that have the potential to really empower victims without compromising the rights of the accused and the actuality of criminal justice.
References
Amriyanto, A., Alting, H., Bakhtiar, H. S., & Putra, G. P. (2024). Breaking the cycle: Reforming Indonesia’s justice system to prioritize Victim-Centered solutions. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 24(3), 401–428. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2024.24.3.5129
Angkasa, A., Hendriana, R., Wamafma, F., Juanda, O., & Nunna, B. P. (2023). Development of a restitution model in optimizing legal protection for victims of human trafficking in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 8(1), 93–128. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v8i1.67866
Ballucci, D., & Stathakis, F. (2022). Re-Conceptualizing success: Investigating specialized units responses to the sexual trafficking of female Victim-Survivors. Feminist Criminology, 17(5), 661–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/15570851221114396
Dobrin, A., Fallik, S. W., Deuchar, R., Crichlow, V. J., & Harris, S. (2021). Placing the blame in the Post-Ferguson era: an exploration of police attributions for crime, their declining legitimacy, and the breakdown of justice. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 5(2 (In Progress)), 36–56. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/11032
Gachoki, D. W., Oruta, E. M., & Onyango, E. A. (2023). Victims’ Satisfaction with Procedural Justice Reforms in Kakamega Law Courts, Kenya. EAST AFRICAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 4(3), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.46606/eajess2023v04i03.0293
Gerkin, P., Walsh, J., Kuilema, J., & Borton, I. (2017). Implementing restorative justice under the retributive paradigm. SAGE Open, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017691562
Gurevičs, D. (2023). Victim’s paradigm in European Union criminal Law. Teisė, 127, 129–139. https://doi.org/10.15388/teise.2023.127.8
Hall, M. (2017). Exploring the cultural dimensions of environmental victimization. Palgrave Communications, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.76
Hamamah, F. (2023). The government’s responsibility in providing compensation and restitution in the perspective of the legal theory of dignified justice. SASI, 29(4), 616. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v29i4.1530
Hambali, Y. D. U. (2015). Finding voice for victims of crime in the adversarial criminal justice system. GSTF Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.7603/s40741-014-0015-0
Hodgson, N. (2023). Victims as agents of Accountability: Strengthening victims’ right to review at the International Criminal Court. Criminal Law Forum, 34(3), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-023-09458-8
Holder, R. L., & Englezos, E. (2023). Victim participation in criminal justice: A quantitative systematic and critical literature review. International Review of Victimology, 30(1), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/02697580231151207
Izu, C. C., Fabamise, S., & Oyewole, O. (2024). Re-conceptualising the Theory of Justice and the Needs of Victims of Sexual Violence in Nigeria: an Appraisal of a Victim Centered Approach. F1000Research, 13, 1288. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.153823.1
Jurek, A. L., & King, W. R. (2019). Structural responses to gendered social problems: Police Agency adaptations to human trafficking. Police Quarterly, 23(1), 25–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611119873093
Kanwel, S., Khan, M. I., & Asghar, U. (2024). In the Shadow of Justice: Human Rights Implications of Criminal Acts. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 13(1), 578–585. https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2024.13.1.48
Kaylor, L., Weaver, T. L., & Kelton, K. (2022). “Leave your Pain Here:” An illustration of therapeutic jurisprudence through the remarks of Judge Rosemarie Aquilina from the State of Michigan versus Lawrence Nassar. Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice & Criminology. https://doi.org/10.21428/88de04a1.9af43c35
Kirabira, T. R. (2021). ELEMENTS OF AGGRAVATION IN ICC SENTENCING: VICTIM CENTRED PERSPECTIVES. Amsterdam Law Forum, 13(2), 25. https://doi.org/10.37974/alf.406
Kirchengast, T. (2016). Victims’ Rights and the Right to Review: A corollary of the victim’s Pre-Trial Rights to justice. International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy, 5(4), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v5i4.295
Kuts, V., & Trynova, Y. (2024). Concerning the concept of criminal offense and its types. Legal Horizons, 21(2), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.54477/lh.25192353.2024.2.pp.46-52
Leonard, L. J. (2022). Can Restorative Justice Provide a Better Outcome for Participants and Society than the Courts? Laws, 11(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11010014
Maglione, G. (2020c). Restorative Justice Policy in Context: A Legal-Archaeological Analysis. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale De Sémiotique Juridique, 35(2), 493–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09747-0
Malsch, M. (2021). Victims’ fundamental need for safety and privacy and the role of legislation and empirical evidence. Erasmus Law Review, 14(3), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.5553/elr.000203
Mashendra, M., Ibrahim, K. M., Salam, S., Nurcahyo, E., & Chatimah, N. A. (2024). Study of the Implementation restoration concept in the criminal justice system in Indonesia. SASI, 30(4), 339. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v30i4.1888
McGlynn, C., Westmarland, N., & Godden, N. (2012). ‘I just wanted him to hear me’: Sexual Violence and the possibilities of Restorative justice. Journal of Law and Society, 39(2), 213–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2012.00579.x
McNamara, L., Quilter, J., Hogg, R., Douglas, H., Loughnan, A., & Brown, D. (2018). Theorising Criminalisation: The Value of a Modalities Approach. International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy, 7(3), 91–121. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v7i3.511
Olevska-Kairisa, I., & Kairiss, A. (2023). Victims of Heritage Crimes: Aspects of Legal and Socio-Economic Justice. Open Archaeology, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2022-0293
Pemberton, A., Aarten, P. G. M., & Mulder, E. (2017). Beyond retribution, restoration and procedural justice: the Big Two of communion and agency in victims’ perspectives on justice. Psychology Crime and Law, 23(7), 682–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2017.1298760
Perez-Leon-Acevedo, J. (2021). Victims at the Central African Republic’s Special Criminal Court. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 39(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2021.1939607
Phillips, A., & Abdulla, Z. (2021). JUDICIAL OFFICERS’ EXPERIENCES OF INCLUDING VICTIM IMPACT REPORTS IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 57(1). https://doi.org/10.15270/57-1-905
Sattler, P. L. (2020). The Crime Victims’ Rights Act: rhetoric or reality? Greenwich Social Work Review, 1(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.21100/gswr.v1i1.1104
Tuliakov, V. (2024). Victimization and Victim-Oriented Development of Ukrainian Doctrine of Criminal Law through European Union Dimensions. International Annals of Criminology, 62(2), 426–447. https://doi.org/10.1017/cri.2024.22
Weis, V.V. (2022). Who can organize and exercise effective resistance? A southern criminology perspective on the victimology of state crime. Theoretical Criminology, 27, 381 - 403. https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806221135598
Wemmers, J., Parent, I., & Quirion, M. L. (2022). Restoring victims’ confidence: Victim-centred restorative practices. International Review of Victimology, 29(3), 466–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/02697580221128830
Yaqoubipour, M., Shua, M. M. A., & Abadi, M. S. H. (2025). The Role of Jurisprudential Liability Foundations, Philosophical Teachings, and Rational Deductions with a Victim-Centered Approach in the Recognition of Iran’s Legislative Criminal Policy. Comparative Studies in Jurisprudence Law and Politics, 7(2), 178–187. https://doi.org/10.61838/csjlp.134
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Saba Noor

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






LEGALOPEDIA EDUCATINIA (PVT) LTD