An Analysis of Cohesion in Secondary-Level Textbooks of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
Keywords:
Lexical Cohesion, Grammatical Cohesion, Secondary Level Textbooks, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.Abstract
This study aims to analyze lexical and grammatical cohesion used in secondary-level English textbooks of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Lexical cohesion refers to the connections and relationships between words and sentences within a text. It is the use of cohesive devices, such as repetitions, synonyms, antonyms, hyponyms and meronyms, to create coherence and unity in a written or spoken discourse. Grammatical cohesion refers to the use of grammatical structures and devices within a text to create a sense of coherence and unity. Grammatical cohesion is achieved through various linguistic features; such as pronouns, conjunctions, repetitions, ellipses and referencing. The current study carried a mix-method research design; employing qualitative and quantitative methods to investigate the cohesion patterns in the selected textbooks. The research sample consists of secondary-level English textbooks used in public schools across Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. A random sampling technique is employed by selecting 4 chapters in secondary-level English textbooks, ensuring the representativeness and generalizability of the findings. Besides that, to analyze lexical cohesion, the study employed an extensive corpus linguistics approach. Textual units containing cohesive devices are extracted and statistical measures are used to examine lexical items' frequency, distribution and diversity. Additionally, qualitative analysis of specific instances of lexical cohesion is conducted to assess their effectiveness in maintaining coherence and facilitating comprehension. In the case of grammatical cohesion, a comprehensive examination of reference, ellipsis and conjunction is undertaken. The findings of this study provide insights into the prevailing pattern of lexical and grammatical cohesion in secondary-level English textbooks of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The analysis sheds light on the strengths and weaknesses of secondary-level English textbooks, highlighting areas that may require improvement in terms of coherence and clarity. The research outcomes can serve as a basis for curriculum developers, textbook authors and educators to enhance the quality of instructional materials, ensuring they effectively facilitate learning and comprehension among secondary-level students.
References
Afzaal, M., Hu, K., Chishti, M. I., & Imran, M. (2019). A Study of Pakistani English Newspaper Texts: An Application of Halliday and Hasan’s Model of Cohesion: A Discourse Analysis. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(5), 78-88.
Alarcon, J. B., & Morales, K. N. S. (2011). Grammatical cohesion in students’ argumentative essays. Journal of English and Literature, 2(5), 114-127.
Almurashi, W. A. (2016). An introduction to Halliday’s systemic functional linguistics. Journal for the Study of English Linguistics, 4(1), 70-80.
Armbruster, B. B., & Anderson, T. H. (1988). On selecting" considerate" content area textbooks. Remedial and Special Education, 9(1), 47-52
Bavali, M., & Sadighi, F. (2008). Chomsky's Universal Grammar and Halliday's Systemic Functional Linguistics: An Appraisal and a Compromise. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 11-28.
Carrell, P. L. (1982). Cohesion is not coherent. TESOL Quarterly, 16(4), 479-488.
Cho, H. Y., & Shin, J. A. (2014). Cohesive Devices in English Writing Textbooks and Korean Learners' English Writings. English Teaching, 69(1).
E, A. W. (2017). Discourse analysis. The Handbook of Linguistics, 445-462.
Gebhard, M. (2010). Teacher education in changing times: A systemic functional linguistics (SFL) perspective. Tesol Quarterly, 44(4), 797-803.
Gill, R. (2000). Discourse analysis. Qualitative researching with text, image and sound, 1, 172-190.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (2014). Cohesion in English (No. 9). Routledge.
Hidayat, D. N., & Husna, N. (2022). A Discourse Analysis of Grammatical Cohesion in News Item Text of" Symphony 3" XII Grade English Textbook. JELTL (Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics), 7(1), 171-183.
Hinkel, E. (2001). Matters of cohesion in L2 academic texts. Applied language learning, 12(2), 111-132.
Hjelm, T. (2021). Discourse analysis. The Routledge Handbook of research methods in the Study of Religion.
Ikramullah, Ramzan, M. & Javaid, Z. K. (2023). Psychological Factors Influencing Pashto Speaking ESL Students’ Pronunciation of English Vowels. Pakistan Journal of Society, Education and Language (PJSEL), 9(2), 52–63.
Iqbal, J. (2013). A review of English textbooks at secondary level in the province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Research Journal of Educational Sciences, 2321, 0508.
Javaid, Z. K., Andleeb, N., & Rana, S. (2023). Psychological Perspective on Advanced Learners’ Foreign Language-related Emotions across the Four Skills. Voyage Journal of Educational Studies, 3 (2), 191-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58622/vjes.v3i2.57
Javaid, Z. K., Mahmood, K., & Ali, A. A. (2023). Mediating Role of Mindfulness between Quality of Life and Workplace Stress among Working Women: Quality of Life and Workplace Stress among Working Women. Journal of Workplace Behavior, 4(1), 68-80.
Johns, A. M. (1986). Coherence and academic writing: Some definitions and suggestions for teaching. Tesol Quarterly, 20(2), 247-265. Storrer, A. (2002). Coherence in text and hypertext. Document Design, 3(2), 156-168.
Kafes, H. (2012). Lexical Cohesion: An Issue Only in the Foreign Language? English Language Teaching, 5(3), 83-94.
Ramzan, M., Javaid, Z. K., Kareem, A., & Mobeen, S. (2023). Amplifying Classroom Enjoyment and Cultivating Positive Learning Attitudes among ESL Learners. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 11 (2), 2298-2308. https://doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2023.1102.0522
Ramzan, M., Javaid, Z. K., & Khan, M. A. (2023). Psychological Discursiveness in Language Use of Imran Khan’s Speech on National Issues. Global Language Review, VIII (II), 214-225. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2023(VIII-II).19
Wu, S. (2010). Lexical cohesion in oral English. Journal of language teaching and research, 1(1), 97-101.