Understanding the Pretext of “Strategic Competition” between China and the United States over Taiwan: Is it an Objective Premise or a Misleading Construct?

Abstract

The ongoing contestation between China and the United States over Taiwan has garnered significant attention in international relations, raising critical questions about the nature of their interaction and the underlying premises of this rivalry. This research article examines whether the widely used term "strategic competition" accurately captures the essence of the Sino-American relationship regarding Taiwan or if it is a potentially misleading construct. Through an objective analysis, this article explores counterarguments that challenge the Chinese claim of sovereignty over Taiwan while understanding the United States' plea of "strategic competition." The Chinese perspective centers on Taiwan as an integral part of its territory, driven by the One-China Policy, a stance acknowledged by most of the international community. China contends that its approach to Taiwan is a matter of sovereignty and an internal affair, and foreign involvement, particularly military support, constitutes interference. However, this article presents counterarguments that contest this perspective. First, it emphasizes the principle of Taiwanese self-determination, asserting that the people of Taiwan should have the right to determine their own future. This viewpoint negates China's assertion of sovereignty and underscores the United States' support for self-determination and democratic principles. Second, the article examines the role of democracy and human rights, highlighting Taiwan's flourishing democracy and respect for individual freedoms. In contrast, concerns are raised about China's authoritarian regime, justifying the U.S. position as a defender of democratic values. Third, the research delves into the deterrence factor and regional stability. It argues that U.S. involvement in the region, including its support for Taiwan, serves as a necessary deterrent against potential Chinese aggression, ultimately contributing to regional peace and stability. Lastly, the article discusses humanitarian concerns associated with Taiwan's potential reunification with China. It underscores the importance of preserving the rights and freedoms of the Taiwanese people, arguing that a change in the status quo could lead to human rights violations and a rollback of democratic institutions, further justifying the United States' strategic competition. In conclusion, this research article critically examines the contestation of "strategic competition" in the context of Taiwan between China and the United States. By presenting arguments that challenge U.S. position while supporting the China's claim of sovereignty, it sheds light on the multifaceted nature of this complex international relationship. Ultimately, it calls into question whether the term "strategic competition" is indeed a false premise, urging a deeper and more nuanced understanding of the underlying dynamics at play in this contentious issue.