The Role of AI Systems in Judiciary and its Implication on Society
Keywords:
AI Systems; Judiciary; Regulations; Prejudice; Privacy RightsAbstract
Modern legal landscapes around the world are being shaped by the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into judicial adjudication processes. This study looks at the effects on society and how AI is accepted in court adjudication processes. By combining perspectives from the fields of law, technology, and the social sciences, this study seeks to clarify the complex processes at play when AI is used to make decisions within legal frameworks. This empirical study was initiated by combining qualitative and quantitative data, and it is based on the legitimacy of artificial intelligence from the number of years 1980 to 2023 in developed and developing countries chosen as populations. These countries include the United States of America, the United Kingdom, Australia, Europe, and China. Moreover, this focuses on the laws that regulate data and the ways in which artificial intelligence is influencing the society of these countries. In these countries, cluster sampling is utilised to collect data on the basis of estimated cases that have been resolved through the utilisation of AI robot attorneys. The data collected was analysed through the utilisation of P-software, excel sheet, and Microsoft word. The corresponding results notes that legitimacy of artificial intelligence in judicial adjudication necessitates some core steps as to AI bias and privacy rights. Therefore, it is necessary to craft regulations for the legitimacy of AI in adjudication for the greater interest of society.
References
Calo, R. (2016, Februry 24). Robots in American Law. University of Washington School of Law Research . Paper No. 2016-04, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2737598. doi:Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2737598
Campbell, R. W. (2020, March 30). Artificial Intelligence in the Courtroom: The Delivery of Justice in the Age of Machine Learning. . Ray Worthy Campbell, Artificial Intelligence in the Courtroom: The Delivery of Justice in the Age of Machine Learning,.
Chen, Benjamin Minhao, Alexander Stremitzer, and Kevin Tobia. "Having your day in robot court." Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 36.1 (2022): 127-169.
Dworkin, R. ". (n.d.). " Ethics . 103.4 (1993): 656-685.
Ethics:, A. (2019). AI Ethics: Guidelines for the Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence by the High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence of the European Commission
Forbes. (2023, February). "AI-Powered Legal Services: The Future of Law?"
Giulia Gentile. (2022, August 22). 'AI in the courtroom and judicial independence: an EU perspective',. doi:https://euideas.eui.eu/2022/08/22/ai-in-the-courtroom-and-judicial-independence-an-eu-perspective/
Hildebrandt, M. (2018). Algorithmic regulation and the rule of law. . Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, , 376(2128), 20170355.
International, ". b. (2022, September). "AI-powered legal services to transform European legal landscape".
International, L. (2023, February 2023). China Was Pushing Its Legal Sector to Adopt AI.
Javed, K. (2019). Right of Consular Access under the Vienna Convention Has No Exception: A Critique of Jadhav Case (India v. Pakistan). JL & Soc'y, 50, 63.
Leslie, S. e. (2020). "A critical review of three key challenges in trustworthy AI: debiasing, fairness, and accountability.". Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 75 : 1175-1226.
Martin-Bariteau, F. a.-B. ( 2021. , February 1,). Artificial Intelligence and the Law in Canada .
McCorduck, P. (1989). The AI Winter: Artificial Intelligence BetwThe AI Winter: Artificial Intelligence Between Theory and Practice .
Miller, T. (U. Ill. L. Rev. 113 (2019): 1449.). Artificial intelligence and law: An overview." U. Ill. L. Rev. 113 (2019): 1449.
Monika, Z. D. (2021, Jun 4). Technology and the Courts:Artificial Intelligence and Judicial Impartiality. doi:https://www.alrc.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/3-.-Monika-Zalnieriute-Public.pdf
Re, R. M.-N. (2019). Developing artificially intelligent justice. Stan. Tech. L. Rev., 22, 242. Stan. Tech. L. Rev., 22, 242.
resolution, E. P. (2020). The European Parliament's resolution on Artificial Intelligence .
Review, H. L. (2023). The Regulatory Challenges of AI Robot Lawyers.
Review, T. A. (2022, September). "Australia's AI-powered legal services market to reach $1 billion by 2025".
Rudin, C. a. (2017). • R "Why bias matters in machine learning." Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. .
Russell, S. (2018). The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigation .
Science's, A. A. (2019). Artificial Intelligence: Australia's Next Chapter .
Service's, C. P. (n.d.). The Crown Prosecution Service's use of AI to decide which cases to prosecute:. doi:https://www.theguardian.com/
Service's, N. P. (n.d.). • The National Probation Service's use of AI to predict the risk of re-offending:. doi: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/
Surden, H. (2019) Artifical Intelligence and Law : An overview. U of Colorado Law Legal Studies Research , 35,2019, , paper No. 19-22,. Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3411869
Tenney, B. e. (2019). "Accountability and Fairness in Algorithmic Decision-Making:. A Framework for Understanding Harms and Responsibilities.", " arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.07689 (2019).
Webster, G. (2020). The Chinese Approach to Artificial Intelligence: An Analysis of Policy, Ethics, and Regulation.
Xu, Y. J. (2010). Development and Diffusion of Artificial Intelligence in China
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 H. Imran Ahmed Qureshi, Aatir Rizvi, Muhammad Ramzan Watto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
LEGALOPEDIA EDUCATINIA (PVT) LTD