Strengthening Legislative Review: The Relationship Between Parliament and Independent Rights Commissions for Protection and Promotion of Human Rights in Pakistan

Authors

  • Atta Ul Mustafa Lecturer, Department of Law, Faculty of Shariah and Law, International Islamic University Islamabad

Keywords:

3rd try

Abstract

This article aims to explore the legislative review functions of Pakistan’s Independent Rights Commissions (IRCs), including the National Commission for Human Rights (NCHR), the National Commission on the Status of Women (NCSW), and the National Commission on the Rights of the Child (NCRC), in their engagement with the parliament. It analyses the statutory basis, operational scope, and practical challenges of this relationship within the framework of international and national standards such as the Paris Principles, Belgrade Principles, Abuja Guidelines, national laws and policies. The article seeks to assess how these commissions contribute to harmonizing national legislation with international human rights obligations and advise on legislative and policy reforms. Additionally, it identifies barriers to effective legislative review and provides recommendations to strengthen collaboration between parliament and IRCs for promotion and protection of human rights. By addressing these issues, the article aims to propose a roadmap for enhancing efficiency, and impact of IRCs in legislative review in an independent manner for promoting and protecting human rights in Pakistan.

References

Asia Pacific Forum. 2018. Manual On National Human Rights Institutions. Sydney. https://asiapacificforum.net/resources/manual-on-nhris.

Commonwealth. 2004. ‘The Abuja Guidelines on the Relationship Between Parliaments, Parliamentarians and Commonwealth National Human Rights Institutions’. British Council. https://www.agora-parl.org/resources/library/abuja-guidelines-relationship-between-parliaments-parliamentarians-and.

Constitution of Pakistan. 1973.

Dawn. 2016. ‘NCHR Chairman Told to “Get out” of NA Body Meeting - Newspaper’. 2016. https://www.dawn.com/news/1287052.

GANHRI. 2018. ‘General Observations of the Sub-Committee of Accreditation’. GANHRI. https://ganhri.org/accreditation/general-observations/.

General Assembly. 1993. ‘Principles Relating to the Status of National Institutions (The Paris Principles)’. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/principles-relating-status-national-institutions-paris.

General Assembly and OHCHR. 2012. ‘Belgrade Principles on the Relationship between National Human Rights Institutions and Parliaments’. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. https://ganhri.org/resources/belgrade-principles/.

Government of Pakistan. 1973. ‘Rules Of Business, 1973 (As Amended up to 18th December, 2024)’. Islamabad: Cabinet Division. https://cabinet.gov.pk/Detail/ZGUzMWFiODAtMzczYS00ZDE2LThjZWYtNjM1NjJlNjAyMGIz.

———. 2012a. The National Commission for Human Rights Act, 2012. https://nchr.gov.pk/.

———. 2012b. The National Commission on Status of Women Act, 2012. https://www.senate.gov.pk/uploads/documents/1519989322_176.pdf.

———. 2017. The National Commission on the Rights of the Child Act, 2017. https://ncrc.gov.pk/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/NCRC-amended-Act-2017-Q.pdf.

Manfred Nowak, Jeroen Klok, and Ingeborg Schwarz. 2005. Human Rights: Handbook for Parliamentarians. 5. France: SADAG, Bellegarde-sur-Valserine. https://www.ipu.org/resources/publications/handbooks/2016-07/human-rights-handbook-parliamentarians.

Murray, Rachel. 2007. ‘The Relationship Between Parliaments and National Human Rights Institutions’. In Judges, Transition, and Human Rights, edited by John Morison, Kieran McEvoy, and Gordon Anthony, 356–76. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199204939.003.0016.

National Assembly. 2007. ‘Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the National Assembly’. Islamabad: National Assembly. https://na.gov.pk/uploads/publications/rules_procedure.pdf.

National Commission for Human Rights. 2022. ‘Annual Report 2022’. Islamabad: NCHR. https://nchr.gov.pk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Annual-Report-2022.pdf.

National Commission on Status of Women. 2025. ‘National Commission on the Status of Women’. 2025. https://ncsw.gov.pk/Detail/ZjQ0NWZmYTMtNTc1Mi00NzE5LTkzZTctN2E0NzY1ZjEzNjQ2.

OHCHR. 2010. National Human Rights Institutions: History, Principles, Roles and Responsibilities. Rev. 1. Professional Training Series 4, Rev.1. New York Geneva: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.

———. 2018. ‘Contribution of Parliaments to the Work of the Human Rights Council and Its Universal Periodic Review - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights’. A/HRC/38/25. Human Rights Council. https://ap.ohchr.org/documents/dpage_e.aspx?si=A/HRC/38/25.

Senate of Pakistan. 2012. ‘Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Senate 2012’. Senate of Pakistan. https://senate.gov.pk/en/publication.php?id=3?id=-1&catid=7&subcatid=246&cattitle=Rules%20and%20Acts.

The National Commission on the Rights of the Child. 2024. ‘Annual Report 2024’. Islamabad: NCRC. https://ncrc.gov.pk/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Annual-Report-ncrc.pdf.

Downloads

Published

10.03.2025

How to Cite

Strengthening Legislative Review: The Relationship Between Parliament and Independent Rights Commissions for Protection and Promotion of Human Rights in Pakistan. (2025). PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF LAW, ANALYSIS AND WISDOM, 4(2), 17-27. https://pjlaw.com.pk/index.php/Journal/article/view/v4i2-17-27