Private Actions for Damages in Pakistan Competition Regime: Is there a Possibility?

Authors

  • Dr. Sayyeda Fatima Assistant Professor/ In-charge Department of Law, International Islamic University, Islamabad

Keywords:

Private Action for Damages, Competition Infringement, Competition Commission of Pakistan, Competition Act 2010, Private Enforcement of Competition Law

Abstract

Infringements of competition rules are damaging to the economy and also cause direct harm to businesses (competitors) and citizens (e.g., the infringer’s customers). As direct affectees of competition law infringements, the customers pay higher prices and the competitors bear a loss of profit by those who are involved in such anti-competitive conduct. This is real harm to competition and consumer welfare. In Pakistan, there is a need to launch a discussion on the possibilities of introducing private actions for damages for anti-competitive conduct. There is also a need to evaluate the impact of the availability of a fully functional system of private enforcement of competition law focusing on actions for damages, taking guidance from a competition jurisdiction with an effective private enforcement system. The impact assessment will highlight the possible economic and social impacts of the various options available in order to ensure effective private enforcement of competition law. The process to initiate designing private damages actions in Pakistan must keep in mind the possible advantages of effective damages actions in competition cases. The Competition Commission of Pakistan needs to identify possible policy options and legal changes in order to facilitate private actions for damages in competition cases. This article discusses the concept of private enforcement, its significance, and its main objectives. It reviews the existing provisions, if any, concerning private damages actions against anti-competitive conduct in Pakistan's competition regime. It further deliberates on the development of a private enforcement mechanism in the European Union competition regime; and how the competition regime of Pakistan could benefit from the European Union competition jurisdiction for developing an effective private enforcement mechanism.

References

Amendments to the Commission Notice on immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases. OJ C 256, 5.8.2015, p. 1

Amendments to the Commission Notice on the conduct of settlement procedures in view of the adoption of Decisions pursuant to Article 7 and Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 in cartel cases. OJ C 256, 5.8.2015, p. 2

Amendments to the Commission Notice on the cooperation between the Commission and courts of the EU Member States in the application of Articles 81 and 82 EC. OJ C 256, 5.8.2015, p. 5

Amendments to the Commission Notice on the rules for access to the Commission file in cases pursuant to Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, Articles 53, 54 and 57 of the EEA Agreement and Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. OJ C 256, 5.8.2015, p. 3

Baker, D.I. (2004). Revisiting History: What Have We Learned about Private Antitrust Enforcement that We would Recommend to others?, The Future for Private Rights of Action in Antitrust. Loyola Consumer Law Review. Special Issue 16 (4), 379-408

Beckenstein, A.R. and Gabel, H.L. (1986). The Economics of Antitrust Compliance. Southern Economic Journal 52(3), 673-692

Case C-199/11. Europese Gemeenschap v Otis NV and others. ECLI:EU:C:2012:684

Case C-360/09. Pfleiderer AG v Bundeskartellamt. ECLI:EU:C:2011:389

Case C-453/99. Courage Ltd v Bernard Crehan and Bernard Crehan v Courage Ltd and others. ECLI:EU:C:2001:465

Case C-536/11. Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde v Donau Chemie AG and others. ECLI:EU:C:2013:366

Cauffman, C. (2011). The Interaction of Leniency Programmes and Actions for Damages. The Competition Law Review 7(2), 181-220

Cauffman, C. and Philipsen, N. (2014, Nov.). “Who Does What in Competition Law: Harmonizing the Rules on Damages for Infringements of the EU Competition Rules?”. Maastricht European Private Law Institute Working Paper No. 2014/19. http://awards.concurrences.com/IMG/pdf/who.pdf (last consulted on 6.1.2024).

Centre for European Policy Studies. (2007, Dec., 21) Erasmus University Rotterdam and Luiss Guido Carli. Report for the European Commission. “Making antitrust damages actions more effective in the EU: welfare impact and potential scenarios”. Contract DG COMP/2006/A3/012. http://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/actionsdamages/files_white_paper/impact_study .pdf (last consulted on 20.2.2024)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1348 of 3 August 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 relating to the conduct of proceedings by the Commission pursuant to Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty. OJ L 208, 5.8.2015, p. 3

Competition Commission of Pakistan. (2008). Report on State of Competition in Pakistan. http://www.cc.gov.pk/images/Downloads/research_and_publications/state_of_competitio n_report_2008.pdf (last consulted on 13.5.2024)

Competition Commission of Pakistan. Press Release. (2013, Mar., 6). Consumers can claim compensation based on decisions of CCP. http://www.cc.gov.pk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=270&Itemid=1 51 (last consulted on 18.5.2024)

Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty. OJ L 1, 4.1.2003, p. 1 Directive 2014/104/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 November 2014 on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union. OJ L 349, 5.12.2014, p. 1

European Commission. (2005). Green Paper - Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules. COM (2005) 672, 19.12.2005

European Commission. (2008).White Paper on Damages Actions for Breach of the EC antitrust rules. COM (2008) 165, 2.4.2008

European Commission. (2013). Communication on quantifying harm in actions for damages based on breaches of Article 101 or 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. OJ C 167, 13.6.2013, p. 19

European Commission. (2013). Damages actions for breach of the EU antitrust rules, Impact Assessment Report. Commission Staff Working Document. SWD(2013) 203 final, 11.6.2013, p. 5

European Commission. (2013). Practical Guide quantifying harm in actions for damages based on breaches of Article 101 or 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Commission Staff Working Document. SWD(2013) 205, 11.6.2013

European Commission. (2013). Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union. COM(2013) 404, 11.6.2013

European Commission. (2014, Apr., 17). “Antitrust: Commission proposal for Directive to facilitate damages claims by victims of antitrust violations – frequently asked questions”. MEMO/14/310. http://europa.eu/rapid/ (last consulted on 2.6.2024).

European Commission. (2014, Nov., 10). “Antitrust: Commission welcomes Council adoption of Directive on antitrust damages actions”. IP/14/1580. http://europa.eu/rapid/ (last consulted on 20.2.2024).

European Commission. (2019). Guidelines for national courts on how to estimate the share of overcharge which was passed on to the indirect purchaser. OJ C 267, 9.8.2019, p. 4

European Commission. (2020). Commission Staff Working Document

on the implementation of Directive 2014/104/EU of the European Parliament and of the

Council of 26 November 2014 on certain rules governing actions for damages under

national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States

and of the European Union. SWD(2020) 338 final, 14.12.2020.

European Commission. (2020). Communication on the protection of confidential information by national courts in proceedings for the private enforcement of EU competition law. OJ C 242, 22.7.2020, p. 1

European Commission. (2020). Report on Implementation of Damages Directive. https://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/actionsdamages/report_on_damages_directive_i mplementation_en.pdf. (last consulted on 17.5.2024)

European Commission. (2020, Dec., 14). “Antitrust: Commission Publishes Report on implementation of Damages Directive”. IP/20/2413. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_2413 (last consulted on 17.5.2024)

Evrard, S.J., and Taylor, N. (2012, May). Cartel Leniency in the Asia-Pacific Region, Jones Day Publications. http://awa2013.concurrences.com/business-articles-awards/article/cartel- leniency-in-the-asia (last consulted on 18.5.2024)

Feinberg, R.M. (1985). The Enforcement and Effects of European Competition Policy: Results of a Survey of Legal Opinion. Journal of Common Market Studies 23(4), 373-384

Gutta, N.B. (2014). The Enforcement of EU Competition Rules by Civil Law. Portland: Maklu Hüschelrath, K. and Peyer, S. (2013, Apr.). “Public and Private Enforcement of Competition Law – A Differentiated Approach”. ZEW Centre for European Economic Research. Discussion Paper No. 13-029. http://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp13029.pdf (last consulted on 26.1.2024).

Hüschelrath, K. (2014). Public Enforcement of Anti-Cartel Laws – Theory and Empirical Evidence. In Kai Hüschelrath, Heike Schweitzer (Eds.) Public and Private Enforcement of Competition Law in Europe: Legal and Economic Perspectives. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 9-38

Hüschelrath, K. and Schweitzer, H. (2014). Public and Private Enforcement of Competition Law in Europe – Introduction and Overview. In Kai Hüschelrath, Heike Schweitzer (Eds.) Public and Private Enforcement of Competition Law in Europe: Legal and Economic Perspectives. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 1-8

Italianer, A. (2012, Feb., 17). Public and private enforcement of competition law. Speech Delivered on 5th International Competition Conference. Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/competition/speeches/text/sp2012_02_en.pdf (last consulted on 26.1.2024)

Jones, A. and Sufrin, B. (2014). EU Competition Law: Text, Cases and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Komninos, A.P. (2013). Private Enforcement in the EU with Emphasis on Damages Actions. In Ioannis Lianos and Damien Geradin (Eds.) Handbook on European Competition Law: Enforcement and Procedure. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 228-272

Lorenz, M. (2013). An Introduction to EU Competition Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Lowe, P. and Marquis, M. (Eds.). (2014). European Competition Law Annual 2011: Integrating Public and Private Enforcement of Competition Law - Implications for Courts and Agencies. Oxford: Hart Publishing

Mändmaa, P. (2014). Assessing the Effectiveness of Competition Law Enforcement Policy in Relation to Cartels. Journal of Arts & Humanities 3(11), 33-50

Mezzanotte, L.M. (2013). Cartels under attack: the development of private antitrust damages actions in the European Union, International and Comparative Competition Law Review 35(3), 99-126

Report for the European Commission. (2007, Dec., 21) “Making antitrust damages actions more effective in the EU: welfare impact and potential scenarios”. Centre for European Policy Studies. Erasmus University Rotterdam and Luiss Guido Carli. Contract DG COMP/2006/A3/012. http://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/actionsdamages/files_white_paper/impact_study .pdf (last consulted on 20.5.2024).

Rosochowicz, P.H. (2005, Feb., 17). “Deterrence and the Relationship between Public and Private Enforcement in Competition law”. Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics. Working Paper. http://acle.uva.nl/events/competition--regulation-meetings/working-papers-cr- meeting-2005.html (last consulted on 4.5.2024).

Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd v Visa Europe Services LLC and others; and MasterCard Incorporated and others, [2020] UKSC 24

Van den Bergh, R. (2013). Private Enforcement of European Competition Law and the Persisting Collective Action Problem. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 20(1), 12-34

Wardhaugh, B. (2013). Cartel Leniency and Effective Compensation in Europe: The Aftermath of Pfleiderer. Web Journal of Current Legal Issues 19(3)

Willis, P. (2014, Apr., 1). Draft EU Antitrust Damages Directive Nears Final Form. Bird & Bird. http://www.twobirds.com/en/news/articles/2014/global/draft-eu-antitrust-damages- directive-nears-final-form (last consulted on 2.5.2024)

World Bank. (2007). A Framework for a New Competition Policy and Law: Pakistan. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/19612 (last consulted on 3.5.2024)

Downloads

Published

30.06.2024

How to Cite

Dr. Sayyeda Fatima. (2024). Private Actions for Damages in Pakistan Competition Regime: Is there a Possibility?. PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF LAW, ANALYSIS AND WISDOM, 3(6), 36–48. Retrieved from http://pjlaw.com.pk/index.php/Journal/article/view/v3i6-36-48

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.