Analyzing Pakistan's Counter-Terrorism Strategies in the Lens of Balancing Rights, Interests and Security

Authors

  • Khurram Baig PhD Scholar University Gillani Law College, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan

Keywords:

Individual Rights, Societal Interests, State Security, Counter-Terrorism Initiatives, Pakistan, Civil Liberties

Abstract

This doctrinal research delves into the intricate dynamics surrounding individual rights, societal interests, and state security within the framework of counter-terrorism initiatives in Pakistan. The study seeks to unravel the nuanced interplay between these key elements, navigating the delicate balance that policymakers must strike in crafting effective and ethically sound counter-terrorism strategies. The examination begins by scrutinizing the evolving landscape of individual rights in Pakistan, evaluating the impact of counter-terrorism measures on civil liberties and the protection of personal freedoms. Through a meticulous analysis of legal frameworks, court decisions, and human rights discourse, the research aims to elucidate the complex web of considerations that dictate the scope and limitations of individual rights in the context of counter-terrorism. Furthermore, the research extends its focus to the intricate relationship between societal interests and counter-terrorism efforts. By exploring the socio-political dynamics at play, the article dissects the challenges and opportunities presented by aligning societal interests with security imperatives. Additionally, it investigates the role of public opinion, media influence, and civil society engagement in shaping the narrative around counter-terrorism measures. Furthermore the nexus between individual rights, societal interests, and state security, emphasizing the delicate equilibrium that policymakers must achieve. The research evaluates the efficacy and ethical implications of various counter-terrorism strategies, shedding light on the trade-offs between security imperatives and the preservation of democratic values. Ultimately, this study contributes a nuanced understanding of the intricate interplay between individual rights, societal interests, and state security, offering insights crucial for policymakers, legal practitioners, and scholars engaged in the discourse surrounding counter-terrorism initiatives in Pakistan.

References

Ahmad, I., & Rafiq, A. (Eds.). (2016). Pakistan's democratic transition: Change and persistence. Taylor & Francis.

Alkire, S. (2003). A Conceptual Framework for Human Security.

Aly, A., Balbi, A. M., & Jacques, C. (2015). Rethinking countering violent extremism: Implementing the role of civil society. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 10(1), 3-13.

Ammari, F., & Benrezzouq, N. (2023). Conflictuality in the G5 Sahel region: The Role of Economic Factors and Regional Resilience.

Asante, D. (2023). Civil society and counter-terrorism governance: implementing the WPS agenda in Nigeria. Global society, 37(3), 420-443.

Brooker, E. E., Hopkins, C. R., Devenport, E., Greenhill, L., & Duncan, C. (2019). Civil society participation in the Scottish marine planning process and the role of Environmental Non-Governmental Organisations. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(12), 2101-2123.

Burke, A. (2007). Beyond security, ethics and violence: war against the other. Routledge.

Buzan, B. (2008). People, states & fear: an agenda for international security studies in the post-cold war era. ECPR press.

Choudhury, T., & Fenwick, H. (2013). The impact of counter-terrorism measures on Muslim communities 1. In Developments in Counter-Terrorist Measures and Uses of Technology (pp. 45-75). Routledge.

De Londras, F., & Doody, J. (Eds.). (2015). The impact, legitimacy and effectiveness of EU counter-Terrorism. Routledge.

de Macedo Braga, C., & Tomesani, A. M. (2021). Civil society, pacification programs, and anti-terrorism: Brazil’s ambiguous entrance into the Global War on Terror. In Counter-terrorism and civil society (pp. 76-92). Manchester University Press.

Demirsu, I. (2017). Counter-terrorism and the Prospects of Human Rights: Securitizing Difference and Dissent. Springer.

Dower, N. (2007). World ethics: the new agenda. Edinburgh University Press.

Dunn Cavelty, M. (2014). Breaking the cyber-security dilemma: Aligning security needs and removing vulnerabilities. Science and engineering ethics, 20, 701-715.

Eckenwiler, L., & Hunt, M. (2017). Health and security: ethical principles for counter-terror policy and practice in protection crises and beyond. Medicine, conflict and Survival, 33(1), 18-31.sssss

Eckenwiler, L., & Hunt, M. (2017). Health and security: ethical principles for counter-terror policy and practice in protection crises and beyond. Medicine, conflict and Survival, 33(1), 18-31.

Eijkman, Q. (2012). Counter-Terrorism, Technology and Transparency: Reconsidering state accountability?. International Centre for Counter-Terrorism (ICCT).

Elbe, S. (2017). Should HIV/AIDS be securitized? The ethical dilemmas of linking HIV/AIDS and security. In Global Health (pp. 239-264). Routledge.

Fayyaz, S. (2012). Pakistan response towards terrorism: a case study of Musharraf regime (Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham).

Feyyaz, M. (2020). Countering terrorism in Pakistan: Challenges, conundrum and resolution. In Non-Western responses to terrorism (pp. 184-218). Manchester University Press.

Fisk, R. P., Alkire, L., Anderson, L., Bowen, D. E., Gruber, T., Ostrom, A. L., & Patrício, L. (2020). Elevating the human experience (HX) through service research collaborations: introducing ServCollab. Journal of Service Management, 31(4), 615-635.

Garcia Valencia, O. A., Suppadungsuk, S., Thongprayoon, C., Miao, J., Tangpanithandee, S., Craici, I. M., & Cheungpasitporn, W. (2023). Ethical Implications of Chatbot Utilization in Nephrology. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 13(9), 1363.

Ghaemmaghami, A. R. (2020). Delegated Safeguarding Or Surveillance by Proxy?: The Problem with Prevent: a Critical Discourse Analysis of Community-level Counterradicalisation Strategy (Doctoral dissertation, University of Portsmouth).

Gilani, S. R. S. (2019). The significance of the doctrine of proportionality in the context of militant democracy to protect the freedom of expression (Doctoral dissertation, Brunel University London).

Hamilton, C., & Lippert, R. K. (2020). Governing through human rights in counter-terrorism: Proofing, problematization and securitization. Critical Criminology, 28, 127-145.

Ipe, J., Cockayne, J., & Millar, A. (2010). Implementing the UN global counter-terrorism strategy in West Africa. Global Center on Cooperative Security..

Jackson, R. (2005). Security, democracy, and the rhetoric of counter-terrorism. Democracy and Security, 1(2), 147-171.

Kass, N. E. (2001). An ethics framework for public health. American journal of public health, 91(11), 1776-1782.

Kessler, J. K., & Pozen, D. E. (2018). The search for an egalitarian first amendment. Columbia Law Review, 118(7), 1953-2010.

Latif, F. (2019). The Role of Public Diplomacy in US Counter Violent Extremism Policy: A Case Study of Pakistan (Doctoral dissertation).

Martin-Mazé, M. (2013). Report on Societal Understandings of Impact, Legitimacy and Effectiveness in the Counter-Terrorism Context.

Martin-Mazé, M. (2013). Report on Societal Understandings of Impact, Legitimacy and Effectiveness in the Counter-Terrorism Context.

Moşteanu, N. R. (2023). Thriving in the entrepreneurial landscape of sustainability and intelligent automation era. Green and Low-Carbon Economy.

Moynihan, D. P., & Soss, J. (2014). Policy feedback and the politics of administration. Public administration review, 74(3), 320-332.

MUGA, S. O. (2019). International Terrorism And Its Implications On Kenya’s National Security: A Case Of Nairobi City County: 1975-2013 (Doctoral dissertation, Doctoral dissertation, KENYATTA UNIVERSITY).

Musch, S., Borrelli, M., & Kerrigan, C. (2023). The Impact of the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act on the Banking Sector: Individuals’ Fundamental Rights, Conflicts of Laws and Brexit. Conflicts of Laws and Brexit (August 23, 2023).

Ngeno, V. K. (2019). The Influence of Counter Terrorism Measures in Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi).

Otiso, K. (2009). Kenya in the crosshairs of global terrorism: Fighting terrorism at the periphery. Kenya Studies Review, 1(1), 107-132.

Qadri, S. N. (2020). Framing terrorism and migration in the USA: The role of the media in securitization processes (Doctoral dissertation, University of Glasgow).

Rasmussen, A., & Reher, S. (2019). Civil society engagement and policy representation in Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 52(11), 1648-1676.

Renard, T. (2021). Counter-terrorism as a public policy. Perspectives on Terrorism, 15(4), 2-10

Richards, J. (2012). Intelligence dilemma? Contemporary counter-terrorism in a liberal democracy. Intelligence and national security, 27(5), 761-780

Richards, J. (2012). Intelligence dilemma? Contemporary counter-terrorism in a liberal democracy. Intelligence and national security, 27(5), 761-780.

Salter, M. B., & Piché, G. (2011). The securitization of the US–Canada border in American political discourse. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 44(4), 929-951.

Sarkesian, S. C., Williams, J. A., & Cimbala, S. J. (2008). US national security: policymakers, processes, and politics. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Sen, A. (2017). Elements of a theory of human rights. In Justice and the capabilities approach (pp. 221-262). Routledge.s

Shittu, i. S., hamza, k., & kitabu, m. U. (2023). Regional cooperation and the fight against insurgency in west africa (2010-2021). Journal of Political Discourse, 1(3), 149-163.

Tellidis, I., & Toros, H. (Eds.). (2015). Researching terrorism, peace and conflict studies: Interaction, synthesis and opposition. Routledge.

Volkery, A., & Ribeiro, T. (2009). Scenario planning in public policy: Understanding use, impacts and the role of institutional context factors. Technological forecasting and social change, 76(9), 1198-1207.

Waseem, Z. (2021). Safeguards or infringement? Counter-terrorism policies, the state and civil society in Pakistan. In Counter-terrorism and civil society (pp. 255-268). Manchester University Press.

Wenjuan, S., & Zhao, K. (2023). Balancing fiscal expenditure competition and long-term innovation investment: Exploring trade-offs and policy implications for local governments. Plos one, 18(11), e0293158.

West, L., & Campion, K. (2021). Teaching terrorism and practitioners: context, capabilities, and connectivity in counter-terrorism knowledge and networks. Journal of policing, intelligence and counter terrorism, 16(1), 75-91.

Yawar, S. A., & Seuring, S. (2017). Management of social issues in supply chains: a literature review exploring social issues, actions and performance outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(3), 621-643.

Zumbansen, P. (2012). Comparative, global and transnational constitutionalism: The emergence of a transnational legal-pluralist order. Global Constitutionalism, 1(1), 16-52.

Downloads

Published

30.05.2024

How to Cite

Khurram Baig. (2024). Analyzing Pakistan’s Counter-Terrorism Strategies in the Lens of Balancing Rights, Interests and Security. PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF LAW, ANALYSIS AND WISDOM, 3(5), 46–53. Retrieved from http://pjlaw.com.pk/index.php/Journal/article/view/v3i5-46-53

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)