Abuse of Process of Law: A Case of Abuse of Legal Proceedings in Pakistan
Keywords:
Judicial System, Legal Abuse, Legal Proceedings, Political Interference, PakistanAbstract
A myriad of challenges marks the legal landscape in Pakistan, and this abstract aims to provide a concise overview of the complex issues surrounding legal proceedings in the country. Within the Pakistani judicial system, the abuse of legal proceedings has become a pervasive concern, undermining the very foundations of justice. In summary, this research encapsulates the multifaceted aspects of this issue, examining its historical context, current implications, and potential avenues for reform. A combination of British colonial legacies and indigenous legal traditions has influenced the historical evolution of legal proceedings in Pakistan. Over the years, this amalgamation has created a system that reflects a unique blend of adversarial and inquisitorial approaches. However, this complexity has also paved the way for various forms of abuse within legal proceedings. In contemporary Pakistan, the abuse of legal proceedings manifests in diverse ways, including but not limited to corruption, procedural misconduct, and ethical lapses. Instances of undue influence, political interference, and manipulation of the legal process have eroded public trust in the judiciary. This paper highlight the challenges posed by a system where justice is not only delayed but often denied.
References
Arab News. (2023) Police, Judiciary remain the most corrupt Institutions in Pakistan, survey finds. https://www.arabnews.pk/node/2423291/pakistan
Bilal, M., & Khokhar, F. (2021). Justice Delayed or Denied: The Myth of Justice in Pakistan. Journal of Law & Social Studies (JLSS) Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 124-132.
https://www.advancelrf.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Vol-3.-No.-2-7.pdf
Daudpota, F. (2010). Tort of Malicious Prosecution in Pakistan. Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1530241
Egger, M., Higgins, J. P., & Smith, G. D. (Eds.). (2022). Systematic reviews in health research: Meta-analysis in context. John Wiley & Sons.
Gan, J., Xie, L., Peng, G., Xie, J., Chen, Y., & Yu, Q. (2021). Systematic review on modification methods of dietary fiber. Food Hydrocolloids, 119, 106872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106872
1136/qshc.2004.012781
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., Vitta, J. P., & Wu, J. (2021). Engagement in language learning: A systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Language Teaching Research, 13621688211001289.
https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211001289
Josh & Mak. (2023). Malicious Prosecution, Frivolous litigation and Damages in Pakistan.
Komba, M. M., & Lwoga, E. T. (2020). Systematic review as a research method in library and information science. 10.4018/978-1-7998-1471-9.ch005.
Khan, A. (2023). Corruption exists within judiciary too, is directly linked to ‘faulty inductions’: ex-SC judge Maqbool Baqar. DAWN.
https://www.dawn.com/news/1737998
Nawaz, C. (2021). DELAY REDUCTION WITH EFFECTIVE COURT MANAGEMENT. Federal Judicial Academy.
https://www.fja.gov.pk/files/articles/DELAYREDUCTIONWITHEFFECTIVECOURTMANAGEMENT.pdf
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., & Moher, D. (2021). Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: Development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003
Pakistan Lawyer. (2021). Why is Pakistan's judiciary system different for rich and poor.
Pakistan Today. (2023). Alleged corruption: Two SC judges urge SJC to proceed against Justice Naqvi.
Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2005). Realist review - A new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(1), 21-34. 10.1258/1355819054308530
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing. 10.1002/9780470754887
Rahi, S. (2017). Research design and methods: A systematic review of research paradigms, sampling issues, and instruments development. International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences, 6(2). 10.4172/2162-6359.1000403
Saeed, M. (2020). Improving Efficiency of the Court Service in Pakistan: A Comparative Study of the Options for Reform. Newcastle University Theses.
https://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/bitstream/10443/4973/1/Saeed%20Muhammed%20E-Copy.pdf
Shah, R., Khan, S., & Farid, S. (2014). Causes for Delay in Civil Justice in Lower Courts of Pakistan: A Review. Pakistan Journal of Criminology. Volume 6, No.1, Jan - June 2014, pp.47 – 67
https://www.pjcriminology.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/4-15.pdf
Shah, R., & Khan, S. (2015). The Major Causes of Delay in Civil Justice System in the Lower Courts of Pakistan, a Case study of KPK, Pakistan. Pakistan Research Repository.
Shakeel, A. (2023). The politicisation of judiciary and the judicialisation of politics — who is to blame?. DAWN.
Shigri, A. (2023). Misuse of legal process. DAWN. https://www.dawn.com/news/1774640
Sigamony, T. (2024). SC holds wrongful acquittal or conviction breach of law, abuse of process. Business Recorder.
https://www.brecorder.com/news/40287530
Tribune. (2023). Police, judiciary among top corrupt sectors: survey. The Express Tribune.
https://tribune.com.pk/story/2449584/police-judiciary-among-top-corrupt-sectors-survey
Victor, L. (2008). Systematic reviewing in the social sciences: Outcomes and explanation. Enquire, 1(1), 32-46. https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/sociology/documents/enquire/volume-1-issue-1-victor.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Shahbaz Nazir, Choudhary Hamza Sajid, Dr. Tansif Ur Rehman, Choudhary Ahmed Raza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
LEGALOPEDIA EDUCATINIA (PVT) LTD