Defective Investigation: A Hidden Barrier to Effective Prosecution of Criminal Cases
Keywords:
Investigation, Successful Prosecution, Defective Investigation, Criminal Trial, Criminal Justice SystemAbstract
Defective investigations have now become an unignorable challenge for the successful prosecution of criminal cases. These are such types of defects that lead to acquittals even in an ostensibly strong case. Such investigations create a permanent obstruction even for prosecutors to conduct trials effectively and efficiently before courts. This study aims to analyze the impact of defective investigation on the effective prosecution of criminal cases. For this study, a qualitative case study approach will be employed. Fifteen recent most reported criminal cases have been selected wherein acquittals have been attributed to defective investigations by higher courts in Pakistan. Through the analysis of these cases, this research identifies recurring investigative deficiencies that need to be removed. This research has provided valuable insights into those areas of criminal cases where investigation methodologies and outdated practices need improvement. Based on the findings of the reported criminal cases, this study has offered practical recommendations to change the defective investigation into effective investigation. Through rectification of these fundamental defects and implementation of the recommendations as provided in this study, the investigating agency will be able to aid justice through successful prosecution of criminal cases.
References
Ahmed Ali v. the State 2023 SCMR 781.
Ali Asghar v. the State 2023 YLR 2015.
Amir Mehmood v. the State 2024 YLR 309.
Arshad Ali v. the State 2024 MLD 212.
Babubhai v. the State of Gujarat 2010 AIR SCW 5126.
Baskarada, S. (2014). Qualitative case study guidelines. Baškarada, S.(2014). Qualitative Case Studies Guidelines. The Qualitative Report, 19(40), 1–25.
Bhaghamma, G. (2023). A Comparative analysis of Doctrinal and Non-Doctrinal Legal Research. ILE Journal of Governance and Policy Review, 1(1), 88–94.
Fayaz and Another v. the State 2022 MLD 1452.
Fish, J. T., Miller, L. S., & Braswell, M. C. (2010). Crime scene investigation. Routledge. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=QOU710F3kB4C&oi=fnd&pg=PP2&dq=spot+inspection+crime+scene&ots=SD3uFtyrFW&sig=Q9nw0u-HbTJoj5kF1bDsPNOkrC8
Gammelgaard, B. (2017). The qualitative case study. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 28(4), 910–913.
Haider Ali v. DPO Chakwal 2015 SCMR 1724.
Imran Hussain Alias Mama v. the State 2022 PCrLJ N 84.
Jalat Khan v. the State 2024 PCrLJ 435.
Jamshed, J., Javed, M. W., Bukhari, S. W. R., & Safdar, A. (2020). Role of Police Investigation in the criminal justice system of Pakistan. International Journal of Management Research and Emerging Science, 10(2). https://search.proquest.com/openview/d7da85387129402e55dae53c3940d2c0/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=6467885
Lais Khan v. the State 2022 YLR N 9.
Maqsood, B., Sarwar, M. W., & Azeem, H. M. (2024). Unveiling Flaws in Test Identification Parades: A Guide for Reliable Identifications. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 5(2), 390–400.
Mir Hamal v. the State 2023 PCrLJ 449.
Muhammad Anwar v. the State 2024 YLR 270.
Muhammad Azam v. the State 2024 PCrLJ 306.
Muhammad Imran Alias Mana v. the State 2023 MLD 1993.
Muhammad Rahim v. the State 2024 PCrLJ 42.
Muhammad Riaz v. Khuram Shehzad 2024 SCMR 51.
Muhammad Saddique v. the State 2024 PCrLJ 560.
Muhammad Shahid v. the State 2022 PCrLJ 1492.
Muhammad v. the State 2022 YLR 967.
Muhammad Zaheer Shah v. Amin-Ur-Rehman 2023 YLR 2323.
Mumtaz-Ul-Haq v. the State 2023 YLR 2144.
Ramzan Kasuri, D. M., Mahmood, A. U. K., & Ahmed, G. (2021). Proactive Role of Public Prosecutors in the Administration of Criminal Justice: A Way Forward for Pakistan. Global Legal Studies Review. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4020045
Saif Ullah v. the State 2023 YLR 264.
Saqib Ramzan v. the State 2023 PCrLJ 1479.
Singh, H. N. (2021). Crime scene investigation. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 10(11), 642–648.
Sohail Ahmed Siddiqui v. the State 2024 YLR 811.
State of Bihar v. P.P. Sharma AIR 1991 SC 1260.
Tanveer v. the State 2023 PCrLJ 534.
Umed Ali Alias Umedo Narejo v. the State 2024 MLD 546.
VanGestel, R., & Micklitz, H.-W. (2011). Revitalizing Doctrinal Legal Research in Europe: What About Methodology? https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1824237
Watkins, D. (2017). Research methods in law. Routledge.
Zahid Rasool v. the State 2022 YLR 1725.
Zakia Ahsan Jafri v. the State of Gujarat (2022) 6 SCR 1.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Sulyman Akbar, Sheer Abbas, Tayyaba Batool, Burhan Maqsood
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.